These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The Cochrane Injuries Group celebrates the publication of its 100th review: time to reflect on impact. Bunn F Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 16(3):208-9. PubMed ID: 20570989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation. Aus G; Chapple C; Hanûs T; Irani J; Lobel B; Loch T; Mitropoulos D; Parsons K; Plass K; Schmid HP Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):859-64. PubMed ID: 18657895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Editorial comment on: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation. Galfano A Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):864. PubMed ID: 18657894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relevance of levels of evidence to the urologist. Singh JC; Dahm P Urol J; 2009; 6(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 20027551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Green LW Fam Pract; 2008 Dec; 25 Suppl 1():i20-4. PubMed ID: 18794201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Selective publication of research into antidepressants: consequences for the practice guideline 'depression']. Doornbos B; de Jonge P; Bockting CL Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Jun; 152(25):1406-8. PubMed ID: 18624001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re: Gunnar Aus, Christopher Chapple, Tomas Hanûs, et al. The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines methodology: a critical evaluation. Eur Urol 2009;56:859-64. Dahm P; Yeung L; Schünemann H Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):e21-2. PubMed ID: 19028007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]