These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21209155)

  • 1. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ordered symptom statuses without a gold standard.
    Wang Z; Zhou XH; Wang M
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):567-81. PubMed ID: 21209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random effects models for assessing diagnostic accuracy of traditional Chinese doctors in absence of a gold standard.
    Wang Z; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(7):661-71. PubMed ID: 21626532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 16099683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers.
    Kumar R; Indrayan A
    Indian Pediatr; 2011 Apr; 48(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21532099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing operating characteristics of CAD algorithms in the absence of a gold standard.
    Choudhury KR; Paik DS; Yi CA; Napel S; Roos J; Rubin GD
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1788-95. PubMed ID: 20443501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
    Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Morris JC
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.
    Obuchowski NA
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):567-78. PubMed ID: 9192452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 8934599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.
    Zheng Y; Barlow WE; Cutter G
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 15737102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap-based procedures for inference in nonparametric receiver-operating characteristic curve regression analysis.
    Rodríguez-Álvarez MX; Roca-Pardiñas J; Cadarso-Suárez C; Tahoces PG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):740-764. PubMed ID: 29233083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Novel "Maximizing Kappa" Approach for Assessing the Ability of a Diagnostic Marker and Its Optimal Cutoff Value.
    Chang CH; Yang JT; Lee MH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):1005-19. PubMed ID: 24918528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ROC curve regression analysis: the use of ordinal regression models for diagnostic test assessment.
    Tosteson AN; Weinstein MC; Wittenberg J; Begg CB
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):73-8. PubMed ID: 7851336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A crossed random effects modeling approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy from ordinal ratings without a gold standard.
    Xie Y; Chen Z; Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep; 32(20):3472-85. PubMed ID: 23529923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Profile-likelihood inference for highly accurate diagnostic tests.
    Tsimikas JV; Bosch RJ; Coull BA; El Barmi H
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):946-56. PubMed ID: 12495149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.