These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21209426)

  • 1. Digital mammography workflow.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(3):245M-60M. PubMed ID: 21209426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital Breast Imaging Workflow.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):305M-322M; quiz 323M-326M. PubMed ID: 26721854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression.
    Avrin D; Morin R; Piraino D; Rowberg A; Detorie N; Zuley M; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):609-14. PubMed ID: 17412135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center.
    Kuzmiak CM; Cole E; Zeng D; Kim E; Koomen M; Lee Y; Pavic D; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 20646940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Yaffe MJ; Maidment AD; Martin MC; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608. PubMed ID: 17412134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compare and Contrast: ASRT, ARRT.
    Reid J
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 82(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 21452581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automating radiologist workflow, part 2: hands-free navigation.
    Reiner B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Nov; 5(11):1137-41. PubMed ID: 18954814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A patient-centered care model.
    Enes JE
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(3):212. PubMed ID: 21209422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Issues to consider before implementing digital breast tomosynthesis into a breast imaging practice.
    Hardesty LA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):681-4. PubMed ID: 25714303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Workflow in digital screening mammography].
    Bick U; Diekmann F; Fallenberg EM
    Radiologe; 2008 Apr; 48(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 18305919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital mammography. Why hasn't it been approved for U.S. hospitals?
    Health Devices; 2000 Jan; 29(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10631559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute.
    Shtern F
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):629-30. PubMed ID: 1584908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergency department digital radiology: moving from photos to pixels.
    White FA; Zwemer FL; Beach C; Westesson PL; Fairbanks RJ; Scialdone G
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 11(11):1213-22. PubMed ID: 15528587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advantages of magnification in digital phase-contrast mammography using a practical X-ray tube.
    Honda C; Ohara H
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 18584984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saving time, improving satisfaction: the impact of a digital radiology system on physician workflow and system efficiency.
    Srinivasan M; Liederman E; Baluyot N; Jacoby R
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2006; 20(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 16669596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practice policy and quality initiatives: using lean principles to improve screening mammography workflow.
    Shah CJ; Sullivan JR; Gonyo MB; Wadhwa A; DuBois MS
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(5):1505-17. PubMed ID: 23813321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. FDA & digital mammography: why has FDA required full field digital mammography systems to be regulated as potentially dangerous devices for more than 10 years?
    Nields MW
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 20380981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Which radiology application drives your workflow? Which should?
    Prevedello L; Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Feb; 10(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 23374686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing modality operations.
    Boland GW; Duszak R; Mayo-Smith W
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jul; 11(7):654-5. PubMed ID: 24889478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.