BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21209985)

  • 1. Virtual transplantation in designing a facial prosthesis for extensive maxillofacial defects that cross the facial midline using computer-assisted technology.
    Feng ZH; Dong Y; Bai SZ; Wu GF; Bi YP; Wang B; Zhao YM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 21209985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Fabricating facial prostheses using CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping technique].
    Huang X; Jiao T; Lin Y; Zhang W; Wang C; Zhang F
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 22(2):320-3. PubMed ID: 15884544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coordinated intraoral and extraoral prostheses in the rehabilitation of the orofacial cancer patient.
    Birnbach S; Herman GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Sep; 58(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 3305902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fabrication of an orbital prosthesis using a noncontact three-dimensional digitizer and rapid-prototyping system.
    Yoshioka F; Ozawa S; Okazaki S; Tanaka Y
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):598-600. PubMed ID: 21129080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of laser surface digitizing with CAD/CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses. Part 2: Development of molding techniques for casting prosthetic parts.
    Cheah CM; Chua CK; Tan KH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 14651243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted technique for the design and manufacture of realistic facial prostheses.
    Feng Z; Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Zhou B; Bi Y; Wu G
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 48(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 19556041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation in the UK: a survey of maxillofacial prosthetists' and technologists' attitudes and opinions.
    Hatamleh MM; Haylock C; Watson J; Watts DC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Dec; 39(12):1186-92. PubMed ID: 20832245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of technology in facial prosthetics.
    Davis BK
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug; 18(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 20543693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retaining a large facial prosthesis.
    Tautin FS; Schoemann D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Sep; 34(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 22335000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital image capture and rapid prototyping of the maxillofacial defect.
    Sabol JV; Grant GT; Liacouras P; Rouse S
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 21438958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensional accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufactured orbital prostheses.
    Marafon PG; Mattos BS; Sabóia AC; Noritomi PY
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 20552095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Missing facial parts computed by a morphable model and transferred directly to a polyamide laser-sintered prosthesis: an innovation study.
    Mueller AA; Paysan P; Schumacher R; Zeilhofer HF; Berg-Boerner BI; Maurer J; Vetter T; Schkommodau E; Juergens P; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 49(8):e67-71. PubMed ID: 21458119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Facial prostheses from the viewpoint of the dental technician].
    Gehrke ME
    Quintessenz Zahntech; 1978 May; 4(5):13-7. PubMed ID: 370884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical data acquisition for computer-assisted design of facial prostheses.
    Runte C; Dirksen D; Deleré H; Thomas C; Runte B; Meyer U; von Bally G; Bollmann F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 11951801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an orbital and facial defect: a clinical report.
    Padmanabhan TV; Mohamed K; Parameswari D; Nitin SK
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 22356269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fabrication of a maxillofacial prosthesis using a computer-aided design and manufacturing system.
    Tsuji M; Noguchi N; Ihara K; Yamashita Y; Shikimori M; Goto M
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Sep; 13(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 15345018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rehabilitation of the maxillofacial prosthetic patient.
    Segall BW
    Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1971; 24(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 5134072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an extensive midfacial and palatal postsurgical defect with an implant-supported cross arch framework: a clinical report.
    Tso TV; Tso VJ; Stephens WF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 25749080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant-retained nasal prosthesis for a patient following partial rhinectomy: a clinical report.
    Guttal SS; Patil NP; Thakur S; Kumar S; Kulkarni SS
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 19210608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A prosthesis for the severe loss of maxillofacial substance. 4. Technical procedures: the prosthesis].
    Gennari PU; Melegari M
    Dent Cadmos; 1987 Sep; 55(14):17-32. PubMed ID: 3484267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.