These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21209993)

  • 21. The influence of support properties and complexity on fracture strength and fracture mode of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
    Mahmood DJ; Linderoth EH; Vult Von Steyern P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Jul; 69(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 21231816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: a three-year follow up.
    Boeckler AF; Lee H; Stadler A; Setz JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 19853170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Randomized clinical trial of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: preliminary results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Clark AE; Shuster JJ; Anusavice KJ
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 23758092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fracture resistance of zirconia FPDs with adhesive bonding versus conventional cementation.
    Rosentritt M; Hmaidouch R; Behr M; Handel G; Schneider-Feyrer S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 21479286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
    Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of custom-made procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: a prospective 1-year follow-up study.
    Henriksson K; Jemt T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 14714842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; van der Zel JM; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Mar; 25(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 18829097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic posterior three-unit FDPs made of In-Ceram Zirconia.
    Eschbach S; Wolfart S; Bohlsen F; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):490-2. PubMed ID: 20095200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fracture strength of prefabricated all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses.
    Mehl C; Ludwig K; Steiner M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jan; 26(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 19836829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of substructure design and spacer settings on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns.
    Rosentritt M; Steiger D; Behr M; Handel G; Kolbeck C
    J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):978-83. PubMed ID: 19695301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study.
    Jemt T; Henry P; Lindén B; Naert I; Weber H; Wendelhag I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 12956498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A randomized, prospective, open-ended clinical trial of zirconia fixed partial dentures on teeth and implants: interim results.
    Sagirkaya E; Arikan S; Sadik B; Kara C; Karasoy D; Cehreli M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 22545251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
    Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
    Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Zirconia ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses - first clinical results with a new design.
    Abou Tara M; Eschbach S; Wolfart S; Kern M
    J Dent; 2011 Mar; 39(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 21185905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Rammelsberg P; Schwarz S; Schroeder C; Bermejo JL; Gabbert O
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):758-62. PubMed ID: 22568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Complete mouth reconstruction with implant-supported fixed partial dental prostheses fabricated with zirconia frameworks: a 4-year clinical follow-up.
    Puri S; Parciak EC; Kattadiyil MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):397-401. PubMed ID: 24674806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study.
    Johansson LA; Ekfeldt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 12737250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.