124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21210001)
1. IPS Empress onlays luted with two dual-cured resin cements for endodontically treated teeth: a 3-year clinical evaluation.
Atali PY; Cakmakcioglu O; Topbasi B; Turkmen C; Suslen O
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 21210001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Rubo JH; Santos GC
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Schaible RB; Nikolaenko SA; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year.
Taschner M; Frankenberger R; García-Godoy F; Rosenbusch S; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Am J Dent; 2009 Feb; 22(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 19281114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: 12-year follow-up.
Santos MJ; Freitas MC; Azevedo LM; Santos GC; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Mondelli RF
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1683-90. PubMed ID: 26662120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays.
Audenino G; Bresciano ME; Bassi F; Carossa S
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10635204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
Krämer N; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2005 Mar; 21(3):262-71. PubMed ID: 15705433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Degree of conversion of luting resins around ceramic inlays in natural deep cavities: a micro-Raman spectroscopy analysis.
Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Belli R; Schmitt J; Mocker E; Jandt KD; Müller FA
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 20945750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study.
Naeselius K; Arnelund CF; Molin MK
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 18350945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars, restored with ceromer or heat-pressed ceramic inlays and fixed with dual-resin cements.
Ortega VL; Pegoraro LF; Conti PC; do Valle AL; Bonfante G
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 15089948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Kawamura Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period.
Kaytan B; Onal B; Pamir T; Tezel H
Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 16252535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
