These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21210001)

  • 41. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
    Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 2003 Nov; 19(7):670-4. PubMed ID: 12901993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual-polymerizing resin cements.
    Pekkan G; Hekimoglu C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):242-52. PubMed ID: 19782827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
    Ayad MF; Fahmy NZ; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fourteen years clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays luted using two different adhesion strategies.
    Taschner M; Stirnweiss A; Frankenberger R; Kramer N; Galler KM; Maier E
    J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104210. PubMed ID: 35760206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays.
    Peumans M; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Poitevin A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Apr; 12(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 20157666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The bonding effectiveness of five luting resin cements to the IPS Empress 2 all ceramic system.
    Bookhan V; Essop AR; Du Preez IC
    SADJ; 2005 Apr; 60(3):103, 105-7. PubMed ID: 15901014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements.
    van Dijken JW; Ormin A; Olofsson AL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Nov; 82(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 10559724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The effect of a layer of resin luting agent on the biaxial flexure strength of two all-ceramic systems.
    Pagniano RP; Seghi RR; Rosenstiel SF; Wang R; Katsube N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 May; 93(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 15867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):318-26. PubMed ID: 9855855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Fracture resistance of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic inlays.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC; Lee RB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 11843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin.
    Schulte AG; Vöckler A; Reinhardt R
    J Dent; 2005 May; 33(5):433-42. PubMed ID: 15833400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years.
    Krämer N; Taschner M; Lohbauer U; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Aug; 10(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 18792702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites.
    Cal E; Türkün LS; Türkün M; Toman M; Toksavul S
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):372-80. PubMed ID: 16288949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.
    Ferrari M; Dagostin A; Fabianelli A
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jun; 19(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 12686290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Two-year clinical evaluation of IPS Empress II ceramic onlays/inlays.
    Tagtekin DA; Ozyöney G; Yanikoglu F
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(4):369-78. PubMed ID: 19678440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
    Stappert CF; Guess PC; Chitmongkolsuk S; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.