These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21210006)

  • 21. The influence of abutment angulation on screw loosening of implants in the anterior maxilla.
    Ha CY; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Choi JH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 21365037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments.
    Scarano A; Assenza B; Piattelli M; Iezzi G; Leghissa GC; Quaranta A; Tortora P; Piattelli A
    J Oral Implantol; 2005; 31(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 16447899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study.
    Coppedê AR; Bersani E; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Sartori IA; Ribeiro RF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19548411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A classification system to measure the implant-abutment microgap.
    Kano SC; Binon PP; Curtis DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18271368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple abutment positional guide.
    Carvalho W; Ferreira V; Barboza E
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 19212232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.
    Park SW; Driscoll CF; Romberg EE; Siegel S; Thompson G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 16765157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload.
    Park JK; Choi JU; Jeon YC; Choi KS; Jeong CM
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug; 19(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 20456024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.
    Khraisat A; Baqain ZH; Smadi L; Nomura S; Miyakawa O; Elnasser Z
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 16774595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
    Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.
    Tan BF; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):648-58. PubMed ID: 15508980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of surface topography of implant abutments on retention of cemented single-tooth crowns.
    de Campos TN; Adachi LK; Miashiro K; Yoshida H; Shinkai RS; Neto PT; Frigerio ML
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug; 30(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 20664843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cooling profile following prosthetic preparation of 1-piece dental implants.
    Cohen O; Gabay E; Machtei EE
    J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 20521943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the height of the external hexagon and surface treatment on fatigue life of commercially pure titanium dental implants.
    Gil FJ; Aparicio C; Manero JM; Padros A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19885397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
    Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Design features that may influence bacterial plaque retention: a retrospective analysis of failed implants.
    O'Mahony A; MacNeill SR; Cobb CM
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 11203932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Removal torques of conical, tapered implant abutments: the effects of anodization and reduction of surface area.
    Squier RS; Psoter WJ; Taylor TD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11858571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.