269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21210578)
1. Results of coaxial phacoemulsification through a 1.8-mm microincision in hard cataracts.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Omulecki W
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 21210578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(10-12):314-20. PubMed ID: 22384647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Surgically induced astigmatism after bimanual phacoemulsification through microincision and after standard phacoemulsification].
Wilczyńska O; Wilczyński M; Omulecki W
Klin Oczna; 2010; 112(4-6):115-9. PubMed ID: 20825064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative analysis of early distance visual acuity in patients after coaxial phacoemulsification through the micro-incision (1.8 mm) and after standard phacoemulsification through the small incision (2.75 mm).
Orczykowska M; Owidzkaz M; Synder A; Wilczyński M; Omulecki W
Klin Oczna; 2014; 116(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 25137913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
Dosso AA; Cottet L; Burgener ND; Di Nardo S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery.
Hayashi K; Yoshida M; Hayashi H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 19185236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Microincision cataract surgery with implantation of an Acri. Smart 48S lens].
Lubiński W; Podboraczyńiska-Jodko K; Barnyk K; Karczewicz D
Klin Oczna; 2007; 109(7-9):267-71. PubMed ID: 18260276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microincision cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation for correcting moderate and high astigmatism: pilot study.
Alió JL; Agdeppa MC; Pongo VC; El Kady B
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 20117704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of bimanual microincision phacoemulsification in hard cataracts.
Assaf A; El-Moatassem Kotb AM
Eye (Lond); 2007 Jun; 21(6):807-11. PubMed ID: 16680107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early visual results with the rollable ThinOptX intraocular lens.
Dogru M; Honda R; Omoto M; Fujishima H; Yagi Y; Tsubota K; Kojima T; Matsuyama M; Nishijima S; Yagi Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 15050249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsification.
Wilczynski M; Drobniewski I; Synder A; Omulecki W
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 17191184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
