224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21211489)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of LHRH agonists in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer in Italy.
Iannazzo S; Pradelli L; Carsi M; Perachino M
Value Health; 2011 Jan; 14(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 21211489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of methods of androgen suppression in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.
Seidenfeld J; Samson DJ; Aronson N; Albertson PC; Bayoumi AM; Bennett C; Brown A; Garber A; Gere M; Hasselblad V; Wilt T; Ziegler K
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 May; (4):i-x, 1-246, I1-36, passim. PubMed ID: 11098244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of degarelix for advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer.
Lu L; Peters J; Roome C; Stein K
BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(8):1183-92. PubMed ID: 21883830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Direct and indirect costs of luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogues in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer in Italy].
Fadda V; Maratea D
Recenti Prog Med; 2015 Dec; 106(12):634-40. PubMed ID: 26780073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment costs for advanced prostate cancer using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: a solid biodegradable leuprorelin implant versus other formulations.
Merseburger AS; Björk T; Whitehouse J; Meani D
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 25521079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incomplete testosterone suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists: does it happen and does it matter?
Pickles T; Hamm J; Morris WJ; Schreiber WE; Tyldesley S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E500-7. PubMed ID: 22564197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost-utility analysis of degarelix in the treatment of advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer in the United Kingdom.
Lee D; Porter J; Gladwell D; Brereton N; Nielsen SK
J Med Econ; 2014 Apr; 17(4):233-47. PubMed ID: 24568188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Goserelin (Zoladex) or orchiectomy in metastatic prostate cancer? A quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Nygård R; Norum J; Due J
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(1B):781-8. PubMed ID: 11299844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of three different luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the chemical castration of patients with prostate cancer: Goserelin versus triptorelin versus leuprolide.
Shim M; Bang WJ; Oh CY; Lee YS; Cho JS
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Jul; 60(4):244-250. PubMed ID: 31294133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cost effectiveness of GnRH antagonists in patients with prostate cancer and cardiovascular risk : Comparative analysis against Leuprorelin by the Number Needed to Treat].
Anderson D; Lehmann J; Ecker T; Vosgerau S; Donatz V
Urologe A; 2017 Jul; 56(7):917-924. PubMed ID: 28405705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of androgen suppression therapies in advanced prostate cancer.
Bayoumi AM; Brown AD; Garber AM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Nov; 92(21):1731-9. PubMed ID: 11058616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Leuprorelin, triptorelin: new indications. Locally advanced prostate cancer: minimally assessed me-toos.
Prescrire Int; 2007 Dec; 16(92):243. PubMed ID: 18092407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New treatment paradigm for prostate cancer: abarelix initiation therapy for immediate testosterone suppression followed by a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist.
Garnick MB; Mottet N
BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 22093775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cost-utility analysis of androgen ablation therapy in metastatic prostate cancer].
Fujikawa K; Awakura Y; Okabe T; Watanabe R; Nishimura S
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 94(4):503-11; discussion 511-2. PubMed ID: 12795165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined tamoxifen and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist versus LHRH agonist alone in premenopausal advanced breast cancer: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials.
Klijn JG; Blamey RW; Boccardo F; Tominaga T; Duchateau L; Sylvester R;
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Jan; 19(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 11208825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of leuprorelin acetate in Japanese prostate cancer patients: comparison between 6-month and 3-month depot formulations.
Goto R; Uda A; Hiroi S; Iwasaki K; Takashima K; Oya M
J Med Econ; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28758810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a new leuprorelin formulation on testosterone levels in patients with advanced prostate cancer.
Berges R; Bello U
Curr Med Res Opin; 2006 Apr; 22(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 16684425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are all gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists equivalent for the treatment of prostate cancer? A systematic review.
Bolton EM; Lynch T
BJU Int; 2018 Sep; 122(3):371-383. PubMed ID: 29438592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative efficacy of triptorelin pamoate and leuprolide acetate in men with advanced prostate cancer.
Heyns CF; Simonin MP; Grosgurin P; Schall R; Porchet HC;
BJU Int; 2003 Aug; 92(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 12887472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomised crossover trial to assess the tolerability of LHRH analogue administration.
Williams G; Lindsay S; Bowsher WG
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2003; 6(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 12806381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
