These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21212836)

  • 21. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. It's more than just conflict: The functional role of congruency in the sequential control adaptation.
    Berger A; Fischer R; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():64-72. PubMed ID: 31103922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time-on-task effects.
    Wojciechowski J; Jurewicz K; Dzianok P; Antonova I; Paluch K; Wolak T; Kublik E
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Jan; 45(1):e26549. PubMed ID: 38224538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Error-likelihood prediction in the medial frontal cortex: a critical evaluation.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Schweizer TS; Mars RB; Botvinick MM; Hajcak G
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1570-81. PubMed ID: 16956979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychophysiological Evidence of Response Conflict and Strategic Control of Responses in Affective Priming.
    Bartholow BD; Schepers Riordan MA; Saults JS; Lust SA
    J Exp Soc Psychol; 2009 Jul; 45(4):655-666. PubMed ID: 33981119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Motivation by potential gains and losses affects control processes via different mechanisms in the attentional network.
    Paschke LM; Walter H; Steimke R; Ludwig VU; Gaschler R; Schubert T; Stelzel C
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 111():549-61. PubMed ID: 25731995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visuomotor Correlates of Conflict Expectation in the Context of Motor Decisions.
    Derosiere G; Klein PA; Nozaradan S; Zénon A; Mouraux A; Duque J
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9486-9504. PubMed ID: 30201772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.
    McKay CC; van den Berg B; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():184-191. PubMed ID: 28017818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Different mechanisms can account for the instruction induced proportion congruency effect.
    Desender K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 28366273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Posterior medial frontal cortex and threat-enhanced religious belief: a replication and extension.
    Holbrook C; Iacoboni M; Gordon C; Proksch S; Balasubramaniam R
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 15(12):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33180108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Avoiding another mistake: error and posterror neural activity associated with adaptive posterror behavior change.
    Hester R; Barre N; Mattingley JB; Foxe JJ; Garavan H
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 7(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 18189005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Gyurkovics M; Kovacs M; Jaquiery M; Palfi B; Dechterenko F; Aczel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3777-3787. PubMed ID: 32935289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can the post-error effect mask age-related differences in congruency conditions when education and overall accuracy are controlled for?
    Pereiro AX; Bustamante BF; Cisneros MA; Juncos-Rabadán O
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():177-187. PubMed ID: 29958122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Posterior medial frontal cortex regulates sympathy: A TMS study.
    Holbrook C; Iacoboni M; Gordon C; Proksch S; Makhfi H; Balasubramaniam R
    Soc Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 16(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 34517789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Let your fingers do the walking: Finger force distinguishes competing accounts of the congruency sequence effect.
    Weissman DH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1619-1626. PubMed ID: 31228124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.