These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21213194)

  • 21. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of temporal factors on automatic priming and conscious expectancy in a simple reaction time task.
    Destrebecqz A; Perruchet P; Cleeremans A; Laureys S; Maquet P; Peigneux P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):291-309. PubMed ID: 19526437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The scope and precision of specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 21264746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Subjective time: cognitive and physical secondary tasks affect timing differently.
    Molet M; Alessandri J; Zentall TR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1344-53. PubMed ID: 21416457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stimulus dynamics and temporal discrimination: implications for pacemakers.
    Beckmann JS; Young ME
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 19839705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrasting effects of interference and of breaks in interval timing.
    Gaudreault R; Fortin C; Macar F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 19716109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The specificity of temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Wagener A; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2289-300. PubMed ID: 21970615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The implicit learning of metrical and nonmetrical temporal patterns.
    Schultz BG; Stevens CJ; Keller PE; Tillmann B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):360-80. PubMed ID: 22943558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reaction time changes with the hazard rate for a behaviorally relevant event when monkeys perform a delayed wrist movement task.
    Tsunoda Y; Kakei S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18243554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inter-trial and redundant-signals effects in visual search and discrimination tasks: separable pre-attentive and post-selective effects.
    Krummenacher J; Grubert A; Müller HJ
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1382-95. PubMed ID: 20382173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network.
    Coull JT; Nazarian B; Vidal F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2185-97. PubMed ID: 18457512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A prefrontal ERP involved in decision making during visual duration and size discrimination tasks.
    Gontier E; Le Dantec C; Paul I; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 118(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 18041612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks.
    Ansorge U; Wühr P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1216-35. PubMed ID: 19096944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Schubotz RI; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18987559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 20096395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.