121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21213511)
21. Frozen-thawed transfer cycles: are they comparable with fresh?
Mocanu EV; Cottell E; Waite K; Hennelly B; Collins C; Harrison RF
Ir Med J; 2008 Jun; 101(6):181-4. PubMed ID: 18700513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?
Bredkjaer HE; Grudzinskas JG
Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M
Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost of assisted reproductive technologies for a health maintenance organization.
Hidlebaugh DA; Thompson IE; Berger MJ
J Reprod Med; 1997 Sep; 42(9):570-4. PubMed ID: 9336753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Birth of the first 100 babies in Hawaii after conception in-vitro: experience at the Pacific In-Vitro Fertilization Institute.
Huang T; McNamee P; Kosasa T; Silva J; Hale RW; Terada F; Chun B; Morton C
Hawaii Med J; 1991 Oct; 50(10):358-64. PubMed ID: 1769814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assisted reproductive technology: both sides now.
Cheung AP
J Reprod Med; 2006 Apr; 51(4):283-92. PubMed ID: 16739266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles.
Gerris J; De Sutter P; De Neubourg D; Van Royen E; Vander Elst J; Mangelschots K; Vercruyssen M; Kok P; Elseviers M; Annemans L; Pauwels P; Dhont M
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 14990547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multiple pregnancies as a result of IVF and ET in a program without cryopreservation possibility.
Mardesic T; Zetova L; Muller P; Mikova M; Stroufova S
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1993; 115(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 8438627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of outcomes-based data in reducing high-order multiple pregnancies: the role of age, diagnosis, and embryo score.
Peterson CM; Reading JC; Hatasaka HH; Parker Jones K; Udoff LC; Adashi EY; Kuneck PH; Erickson LD; Malo JW; Campbell BF; Carrell DT
Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1534-41. PubMed ID: 15193473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].
Ertzeid G; Fedorcsak P; Abyholm T; Tanbo T
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(23):3101-2. PubMed ID: 17160114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women.
Henman M; Catt JW; Wood T; Bowman MC; de Boer KA; Jansen RP
Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1620-7. PubMed ID: 16359955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of the Spanish Fertility Society guidelines on the number of embryos to transfer.
Cabello Y; Gómez-Palomares JL; Castilla JA; Hernández J; Marqueta J; Pareja A; Luceño F; Hernández E; Coroleu B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20888295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Transfer of single embryo as a method to reduce twins pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization treatment].
Ravhon A; Hurwitz A
Harefuah; 2002 Mar; 141(3):301-5, 312. PubMed ID: 11944228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical efficiency of oocyte and embryo cryopreservation.
Borini A; Cattoli M; Bulletti C; Coticchio G
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1127():49-58. PubMed ID: 18443329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Twenty years of in vitro fertilization: realization and questions for the future].
van Steirteghem A
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2001; 63(3):193-240; discussion 240-1. PubMed ID: 11499344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimal precycle testing and ongoing cycle monitoring for in vitro fertilization and fresh pre-embryo transfer do not compromise fertilization, implantation, or ongoing pregnancy rates.
Strawn EY; Roesler M; Rinke M; Aiman EJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1623-8. PubMed ID: 10871488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiple births following in vitro fertilization treatment: redefining success.
Umranikar A; Parmar D; Davies S; Fountain S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 23891391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
