These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21216023)

  • 1. Importance of considering intraborehole flow in solute transport modeling under highly dynamic flow conditions.
    Ma R; Zheng C; Tonkin M; Zachara JM
    J Contam Hydrol; 2011 Apr; 123(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 21216023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of groundwater flow patterns around a dual-screened groundwater circulation well.
    Johnson RL; Simon MA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):188-202. PubMed ID: 17428573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.
    Goltz MN; Huang J; Close ME; Flintoft MJ; Pang L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):127-36. PubMed ID: 18674844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory analog and numerical study of groundwater flow and solute transport in a karst aquifer with conduit and matrix domains.
    Faulkner J; Hu BX; Kish S; Hua F
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Nov; 110(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 19767123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A forward modeling approach for interpreting impeller flow logs.
    Parker AH; West LJ; Odling NE; Bown RT
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 19650812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. River-induced flow dynamics in long-screen wells and impact on aqueous samples.
    Vermeul VR; McKinley JP; Newcomer DR; Mackley RD; Zachara JM
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 21087248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geophysical constraints on contaminant transport modeling in a heterogeneous fluvial aquifer.
    Bowling JC; Zheng C; Rodriguez AB; Harry DL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 May; 85(1-2):72-88. PubMed ID: 16574272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analytical solution to transport in three-dimensional heterogeneous well capture zones.
    Indelman P; Lessoff SC; Dagan G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):1-21. PubMed ID: 16844264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling interaction of fluid and salt in an aquifer/lagoon system.
    Fujinawa K; Iba T; Fujihara Y; Watanabe T
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 18715262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of combined direct-push methods used for aquifer model generation.
    Köber R; Hornbruch G; Leven C; Tischer L; Grossmann J; Dietrich P; Weiss H; Dahmke A
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 19341375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probability density function of non-reactive solute concentration in heterogeneous porous formations.
    Bellin A; Tonina D
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Oct; 94(1-2):109-25. PubMed ID: 17628204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining the influence of heterogeneous porosity fields on conservative solute transport.
    Hu BX; Meerschaert MM; Barrash W; Hyndman DW; He C; Li X; Guo L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep; 108(3-4):77-88. PubMed ID: 19683833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of small-scale low and high permeability layers using single well forced-gradient tracer tests: fluorescent dye imaging and modelling at the laboratory-scale.
    Barns GL; Thornton SF; Wilson RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():84-99. PubMed ID: 25478669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of injection conditions on field tracer experiments.
    Brouyère S; Carabin G; Dassargues A
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 15882330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretation of injection-withdrawal tracer experiments conducted between two wells in a large single fracture.
    Novakowski KS; Bickerton G; Lapcevic P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Sep; 73(1-4):227-47. PubMed ID: 15336796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of temporally variable groundwater flow conditions on point measurements and contaminant mass flux estimations.
    Rein A; Bauer S; Dietrich P; Beyer C
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Sep; 108(3-4):118-33. PubMed ID: 19682766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling effects of multinode wells on solute transport.
    Konikow LF; Hornberger GZ
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):648-60. PubMed ID: 16961486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing uncertainty in calibrating aquifer flow model with multiple scales of heterogeneity.
    Zhang Y
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 24749908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of density and viscosity in modeling heat as a groundwater tracer.
    Ma R; Zheng C
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(3):380-9. PubMed ID: 20546316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Solute transport in crystalline rocks at Aspö--I: geological basis and model calibration.
    Mazurek M; Jakob A; Bossart P
    J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Mar; 61(1-4):157-74. PubMed ID: 12598102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.