These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21216324)

  • 1. Optimal screening mammography reading volumes; evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Cornford E; Reed J; Murphy A; Bennett R; Evans A
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 21216324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Film reading in the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme -- are we missing opportunities for earlier diagnosis?
    Jenkins J; Murphy AE; Edmondson-Jones M; Sibbering DM; Turnbull AE
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Apr; 69(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 24411823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program.
    Kan L; Olivotto IA; Warren Burhenne LJ; Sickles EA; Coldman AJ
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):563-7. PubMed ID: 10796940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.
    Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Moss SM
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9934650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study.
    Khoo LA; Taylor P; Given-Wilson RM
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 16244252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum screening mammography reading volumes: evidence from the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Cornford E; Cheung S; Press M; Kearins O; Taylor-Phillips S
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6909-6915. PubMed ID: 33630161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can the NHS Breast Screening Programme afford not to double read screening mammograms?
    Liston JC; Dall BJ
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jun; 58(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 12788317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Organized breast screening programs in Canada: effect of radiologist reading volumes on outcomes.
    Coldman AJ; Major D; Doyle GP; D'yachkova Y; Phillips N; Onysko J; Shumak R; Smith NE; Wadden N
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):809-15. PubMed ID: 16424236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast screening: PERFORMS identifies key mammographic training needs.
    Scott HJ; Gale AG
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79 Spec No 2():S127-33. PubMed ID: 17209118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can radiographers read screening mammograms?
    Wivell G; Denton ER; Eve CB; Inglis JC; Harvey I
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jan; 58(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.
    Smith-Bindman R; Chu PW; Miglioretti DL; Sickles EA; Blanks R; Ballard-Barbash R; Bobo JK; Lee NC; Wallis MG; Patnick J; Kerlikowske K
    JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2129-37. PubMed ID: 14570948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography.
    Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 10572847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
    Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
    van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data.
    Vinnicombe S; Pinto Pereira SM; McCormack VA; Shiel S; Perry N; Dos Santos Silva IM
    Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 19401569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.