These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21216366)

  • 41. Reproducibility and validity of the secondary level School-Based Nutrition Monitoring student questionnaire.
    Hoelscher DM; Day RS; Kelder SH; Ward JL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Feb; 103(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 12589324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Validity and Interrater Reliability of the Visual Quarter-Waste Method for Assessing Food Waste in Middle School and High School Cafeteria Settings.
    Getts KM; Quinn EL; Johnson DB; Otten JJ
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 Nov; 117(11):1816-1821. PubMed ID: 28688883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Recency affects reporting accuracy of children's dietary recalls.
    Baxter SD; Smith AF; Litaker MS; Guinn CH; Shaffer NM; Baglio ML; Frye FH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 14(6):385-90. PubMed ID: 15246326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Reproducibility of the School-Based Nutrition Monitoring Questionnaire among fourth-grade students in Texas.
    Penkilo M; George GC; Hoelscher DM
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2008; 40(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 18174100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparative advantage of 3-day food records over 24-hour recall and 5-day food frequency validated by observation of 9- and 10-year-old girls.
    Crawford PB; Obarzanek E; Morrison J; Sabry ZI
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Jun; 94(6):626-30. PubMed ID: 8195550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development and Validation of a Technology-Based System for Tracking and Reporting Dietary Intake at School Meals.
    Appelhans BM; Martin MA; Guzman M; Olinger T; Pleasant A; Cabe J; Powell LH
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2018 Jan; 50(1):51-55.e1. PubMed ID: 27756593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Developing a digital photography-based method for dietary analysis in self-serve dining settings.
    Christoph MJ; Loman BR; Ellison B
    Appetite; 2017 Jul; 114():217-225. PubMed ID: 28377047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Turkish version of the SPAN questionnaire for highschool students: reproducibility and validity.
    Öz F; Metintas S; Aydın R; Özay Ö
    East Mediterr Health J; 2017 Jan; 22(10):735-741. PubMed ID: 28134425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using digital photography in a clinical setting: a valid, accurate, and applicable method to assess food intake.
    Winzer E; Luger M; Schindler K
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2018 Jun; 72(6):879-887. PubMed ID: 29563639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluating the reliability of assessing home-packed food items using digital photographs and dietary log sheets.
    Gauthier AP; Jaunzarins BT; MacDougall SJ; Laurence M; Kabaroff JL; Godwin AA; Dorman SC
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2013; 45(6):708-12. PubMed ID: 23830245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Main meal frequency measures in the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study: agreement with 7-day 24-h recalls.
    Pedersen TP; Holstein BE; Laursen B; Rasmussen M
    Int J Public Health; 2015 Dec; 60(8):945-52. PubMed ID: 26385778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Food models for portion size estimation of Asian foods.
    Lanerolle P; Thoradeniya T; de Silva A
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2013 Aug; 26(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 23577965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The reliability and validity of the Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire.
    Booth ML; Okely AD; Chey TN; Bauman A
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Dec; 34(12):1986-95. PubMed ID: 12471306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. How children remember what they have eaten.
    Domel SB; Thompson WO; Baranowski T; Smith AF
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Nov; 94(11):1267-72. PubMed ID: 7963170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Conventional analyses of data from dietary validation studies may misestimate reporting accuracy: illustration from a study of the effect of interview modality on children's reporting accuracy.
    Smith AF; Domel Baxter S; Hardin JW; Nichols MD
    Public Health Nutr; 2007 Nov; 10(11):1247-56. PubMed ID: 17381899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of interobserver reliability in nutrition studies that use direct observation of school meals.
    Baglio ML; Baxter SD; Guinn CH; Thompson WO; Shaffer NM; Frye FH
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Sep; 104(9):1385-92. PubMed ID: 15354155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Validity and Reliability of an Expanded Vegetable Questionnaire Among Elementary School Children.
    Landry MJ; Ranjit N; Hoelscher DM; Asigbee FM; Vandyousefi S; Ghaddar R; Davis JN
    Curr Dev Nutr; 2019 Aug; 3(8):nzz080. PubMed ID: 31414072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of a Web-based versus traditional diet recall among children.
    Baranowski T; Islam N; Baranowski J; Martin S; Beltran A; Dadabhoy H; Adame SH; Watson KB; Thompson D; Cullen KW; Subar AF
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2012 Apr; 112(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 22717216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Food Frequency Questionnaire abandonment debate: time to resolve.
    Kandiah M
    Malays J Nutr; 2012 Dec; 18(3):iii-v. PubMed ID: 24568068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Food photographs: practical guidelines I. Design and analysis of studies to validate portion size estimates.
    Nelson M; Haraldsdóttir J
    Public Health Nutr; 1998 Dec; 1(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 10933422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.