These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21216632)
1. Missed and true interval and screen-detected breast cancers in a population based screening program. Hoff SR; Samset JH; Abrahamsen AL; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S Acad Radiol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 21216632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer: missed interval and screening-detected cancer at full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography-- results from a retrospective review. Hoff SR; Abrahamsen AL; Samset JH; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S Radiology; 2012 Aug; 264(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 22700555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological review of prior screening mammograms of screen-detected breast cancer. Hovda T; Tsuruda K; Hoff SR; Sahlberg KK; Hofvind S Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2568-2579. PubMed ID: 33001307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of interval breast cancers diagnosed among participants of the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program. Payne JI; Caines JS; Gallant J; Foley TJ Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 23169791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program. Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program. Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms]. Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer detected at screening and between mammographic screens. Hofvind S; Møller B; Thoresen S; Ursin G Int J Cancer; 2006 Jun; 118(12):3112-7. PubMed ID: 16395702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: pilot study to reduce bias. Gordon PB; Borugian MJ; Warren Burhenne LJ Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 17848684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening program. Hofvind S; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Skaane P Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):652-60. PubMed ID: 19789229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival among women diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer classified as true, minimal signs, or missed through an informed radiological review. Tsuruda KM; Hovda T; Bhargava S; Veierød MB; Hofvind S Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2677-2686. PubMed ID: 33180162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands. Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer missed at screening; hindsight or mistakes? Hovda T; Larsen M; Romundstad L; Sahlberg KK; Hofvind S Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110913. PubMed ID: 37311339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters. Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women. May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. Roelofs AA; Karssemeijer N; Wedekind N; Beck C; van Woudenberg S; Snoeren PR; Hendriks JH; Rosselli del Turco M; Bjurstam N; Junkermann H; Beijerinck D; Séradour B; Evertsz CJ Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 17185661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]