BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21216685)

  • 1. Estimating drop-out probabilities in forensic DNA samples: a simulation approach to evaluate different models.
    Haned H; Egeland T; Pontier D; Pène L; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 21216685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures.
    Haned H; Slooten K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):762-74. PubMed ID: 22981542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 19647706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Allelic drop-out probabilities estimated by logistic regression--further considerations and practical implementation.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Asplund M; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 21733771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic genetic SNP typing of low-template DNA and highly degraded DNA from crime case samples.
    Børsting C; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23523365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems.
    Lohmueller KE; Rudin N; Inman K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():1-11. PubMed ID: 24841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The probability of achieving full allelic representation for LCN-STR profiling of haploid cells.
    Lucy D; Curran JM; Pirie AA; Gill P
    Sci Justice; 2007 Dec; 47(4):168-71. PubMed ID: 18229758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The low-template-DNA (stochastic) threshold--its determination relative to risk analysis for national DNA databases.
    Gill P; Puch-Solis R; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Mar; 3(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 19215879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
    Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out.
    Tvedebrink T; Eriksen PS; Mogensen HS; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 21458395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles.
    Cowen S; Debenham P; Dixon A; Kutranov S; Thomson J; Way K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):400-6. PubMed ID: 20952266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental validation of the IrisPlex system: determination of blue and brown iris colour for forensic intelligence.
    Walsh S; Lindenbergh A; Zuniga SB; Sijen T; de Knijff P; Kayser M; Ballantyne KN
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Nov; 5(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 20947461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the performance of different models for the interpretation of low level mixed DNA profiles.
    Bille TW; Weitz SM; Coble MD; Buckleton J; Bright JA
    Electrophoresis; 2014 Nov; 35(21-22):3125-33. PubMed ID: 25168355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A study of forensic DNA databases].
    Sun D; Hou Y; Li Y; Wu J; Du Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 19(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 12170476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Real-time forensic DNA analysis at a crime scene using a portable microchip analyzer.
    Liu P; Yeung SH; Crenshaw KA; Crouse CA; Scherer JR; Mathies RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Sep; 2(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 19083840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The parasite capacity of the host population].
    Kozminskiĭ EV
    Parazitologiia; 2002; 36(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 11965643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out.
    Ten Have TR; Kunselman AR; Pulkstenis EP; Landis JR
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):367-83. PubMed ID: 9544529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.