These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21216783)
1. Interrater Reliability of Risk Matrix 2000/s. Wakeling HC; Mann RE; Milner RJ Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 21216783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interrater reliability of Risk Matrix 2000/s. Wakeling HC; Mann RE; Milner RJ Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2011 Dec; 55(8):1324-37. PubMed ID: 22114173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interrater reliability, concurrent validity, and predictive validity of the risk for sexual violence protocol. Vargen LM; Jackson KJ; Hart SD Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 31697098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interrater and intra-rater reliability of the VERA-2R tool. Duits N; Kempes M Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1236295. PubMed ID: 37829765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expert versus novice interrater reliability and criterion validity of the landing error scoring system. Onate J; Cortes N; Welch C; Van Lunen BL J Sport Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 19(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 20231744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking "the boss" into the real world: Field interrater reliability of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version. De Beuf TLF; de Ruiter C; Edens JF; de Vogel V Behav Sci Law; 2021 Feb; 39(1):123-144. PubMed ID: 33569848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using Differential Item Functioning to Test for Interrater Reliability in Constructed Response Items. Walker CM; Göçer Şahin S Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Aug; 80(4):808-820. PubMed ID: 32616959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol for Korean Sexual Offenders: A Field Study. Sea J; Hart SD Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2021 Oct; 65(13-14):1423-1445. PubMed ID: 33164610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding Interrater Reliability and Validity of Risk Assessment Tools Used to Predict Adverse Clinical Events. Siedlecki SL; Albert NM Clin Nurse Spec; 2017; 31(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 27906730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes. Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Actuarial assessment of risk among sex offenders. Harris GT; Rice ME Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():198-210; discussion 236-46. PubMed ID: 12839899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The reliability and validity of a modified total neuropathy score-reduced and neuropathic pain severity items when used to measure chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving taxanes and platinums. Smith EM; Cohen JA; Pett MA; Beck SL Cancer Nurs; 2010; 33(3):173-83. PubMed ID: 20357656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of risk assessment measures used in sexually violent predator proceedings. Miller CS; Kimonis ER; Otto RK; Kline SM; Wasserman AL Psychol Assess; 2012 Dec; 24(4):944-53. PubMed ID: 22563984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrater agreement, reliability and validity of the Glamorgan Paediatric Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale. Kottner J; Kenzler M; Wilborn D J Clin Nurs; 2014 Apr; 23(7-8):1165-9. PubMed ID: 23121342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Rater Training on Inter- and Intrarater Reliability When Using the Rat Grimace Scale. Zhang EQ; Leung VS; Pang DS J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 58(2):178-183. PubMed ID: 30755291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement. Elwyn G; Edwards A; Wensing M; Hood K; Atwell C; Grol R Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Apr; 12(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12679504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Test-retest and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. Shultz R; Anderson SC; Matheson GO; Marcello B; Besier T J Athl Train; 2013; 48(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 23675792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders. Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An examination of the interrater reliability between practitioners and researchers on the static-99. Quesada SP; Calkins C; Jeglic EL Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Nov; 58(11):1364-75. PubMed ID: 23864524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]