127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21217527)
41. Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T: Failure of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Provide Added Value.
Platzek I; Borkowetz A; Toma M; Brauer T; Meissner C; Dietel K; Wirth M; Laniado M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 25938212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preliminary assessment of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in predicting treatment outcome in patients with prostate cancer at high risk for relapse.
Pucar D; Koutcher JA; Shah A; Dyke JP; Schwartz L; Thaler H; Kurhanewicz J; Scardino PT; Kelly WK; Hricak H; Zakian KL
Clin Prostate Cancer; 2004 Dec; 3(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 15636684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of prostate volume measured by endorectal coil MRI to prostate specimen volume and mass after radical prostatectomy.
Mazaheri Y; Goldman DA; Di Paolo PL; Akin O; Hricak H
Acad Radiol; 2015 May; 22(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 25708867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prostatic biopsy directed with endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging findings in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and prior negative biopsy findings: early experience.
Prando A; Kurhanewicz J; Borges AP; Oliveira EM; Figueiredo E
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):903-10. PubMed ID: 16118169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Correlation of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging findings with Ki-67, phospho-Akt, and androgen receptor expression in prostate cancer.
Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Drobnjak M; Reuter VE; Zakian KL; Scardino PT; Cordon-Cardo C
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):803-12. PubMed ID: 19244047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology.
Selnæs KM; Heerschap A; Jensen LR; Tessem MB; Schweder GJ; Goa PE; Viset T; Angelsen A; Gribbestad IS
Invest Radiol; 2012 Nov; 47(11):624-33. PubMed ID: 23011187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Temporal B0 field variation effects on MRSI of the human prostate at 7 T and feasibility of correction using an internal field probe.
Arteaga de Castro CS; Boer VO; Luttje MP; van der Velden TA; Bhogal A; van Vulpen M; Luijten PR; van der Heide UA; Klomp DW
NMR Biomed; 2014 Nov; 27(11):1353-60. PubMed ID: 25212868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopy of human prostate at 3 T without endorectal coil: feasibility.
Scheenen TW; Heijmink SW; Roell SA; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Heerschap A
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):507-16. PubMed ID: 17848681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Peripheral zone prostate cancer in patients with elevated PSA levels and low free-to-total PSA ratio: detection with MR imaging and MR spectroscopy.
Vilanova JC; Comet J; Barceló-Vidal C; Barceló J; López-Bonet E; Maroto A; Arzoz M; Moreno A; Areal J
Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 19703854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Role of endorectal prostate MRI in patients with initial suspicion of prostate cancer.
Franiel T; Vargas HA; Mazaheri Y; Böhmer S; Hricak H; Akin O; Beyersdorff D
Rofo; 2013 Oct; 185(10):967-74. PubMed ID: 24490232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging.
Beyersdorff D; Taupitz M; Winkelmann B; Fischer T; Lenk S; Loening SA; Hamm B
Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):701-6. PubMed ID: 12202702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. An exploratory study of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the prostate as preoperative predictive biomarkers of biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy.
Zakian KL; Hricak H; Ishill N; Reuter VE; Eberhardt S; Moskowitz CS; Shukla-Dave A; Wang L; Scardino PT; Eastham JA; Koutcher JA
J Urol; 2010 Dec; 184(6):2320-7. PubMed ID: 20952035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. (31) P MR spectroscopic imaging combined with (1) H MR spectroscopic imaging in the human prostate using a double tuned endorectal coil at 7T.
Luttje MP; Italiaander MG; Arteaga de Castro CS; van der Kemp WJ; Luijten PR; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA; Klomp DW
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 24357271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging.
Akin O; Sala E; Moskowitz CS; Kuroiwa K; Ishill NM; Pucar D; Scardino PT; Hricak H
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):784-92. PubMed ID: 16569788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension.
Wang L; Mullerad M; Chen HN; Eberhardt SC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Hricak H
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 15166321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Prostate cancer: evaluation with endorectal MR imaging and three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging.
Casciani E; Polettini E; Bertini L; Emiliozzi P; Amini M; Pansadoro V; Gualdi GF
Radiol Med; 2004; 108(5-6):530-41. PubMed ID: 15722999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Three Tesla Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison of Performance with and without Endorectal Coil for Prostate Cancer Detection, PI-RADS™ version 2 Category and Staging with Whole Mount Histopathology Correlation.
Mirak SA; Shakeri S; Bajgiran AM; Felker ER; Sung KH; Asvadi NH; Khoshnoodi P; Markovic D; Ponzini D; Ahuja P; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Lu D; Raman SS
J Urol; 2019 Mar; 201(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30273608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Does endorectal coil MRI increase the accuracy of preoperative prostate cancer staging?
Pooli A; Isharwal S; Cook G; Oliveto JM; LaGrange CA
Can J Urol; 2016 Dec; 23(6):8564-8567. PubMed ID: 27995852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
