These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21217912)

  • 1. Determination of absorbed dose to water for high-energy photon and electron beams-comparison of the standards DIN 6800-2 (1997), IAEA TRS 398 (2000) and DIN 6800-2 (2006).
    Zakaria GA; Schuette W
    J Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 32(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 21217912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reference Dosimetry according to the New German Protocol DIN 6800-2 and Comparison with IAEA TRS 398 and AAPM TG 51.
    Zakaria A; Schuette W; Younan C
    Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2011 Apr; 7(2):e15. PubMed ID: 22287987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].
    Zakaria GA; Schütte W
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14732959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Dosimetry Protocols for Electron Beam Radiotherapy Calibrations and Measurement Uncertainties.
    Elbashir FEM; Ksouri W; Eisa MH; Alanazi S; Habbani F; Sulieman A; Bradley DA; Suliman II
    Life (Basel); 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35054424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed dose determination for high energy photon and electron beams at a PRIMUS linear accelerator using the documents DIN 6800-2 and TRS-398.
    Hartmann GH
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 14732953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
    Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
    Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified electron beam output calibration based on IAEA Technical Report Series 398.
    Pawiro SA; Mahfirotin DA; Assegab MI; Wibowo WE
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13573. PubMed ID: 35226389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of protocols for external beam radiotherapy beam calibrations.
    Saeed Al-Ahbabi S; Bradley DA; Beyomi M; Alkatib Z; Adhaheri S; Darmaki M; Nisbet A
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Jul; 70(7):1331-6. PubMed ID: 22608983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Absolute dose determination in high-energy electron beams: Comparison of IAEA dosimetry protocols.
    Sathiyan S; Ravikumar M
    J Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 33(3):108-13. PubMed ID: 19893700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental determination of the effective point of measurement and the displacement correction factor for cylindrical ionization chambers in a 6 MV photon beam.
    Legrand C; Hartmann GH; Karger CP
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6869-80. PubMed ID: 23038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified calibration protocols in electron beam dosimetry: comparison with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
    Yulinar C; Assegab MI; Wibowo WE; Pawiro SA
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Jul; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37442101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.