These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21221045)

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of an in-the-mouth bone conduction device for single-sided deafness.
    Murray M; Popelka GR; Miller R
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):437-43. PubMed ID: 21221045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term safety and benefit of a new intraoral device for single-sided deafness.
    Murray M; Miller R; Hujoel P; Popelka GR
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1262-9. PubMed ID: 21799455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Preliminary audiological evaluation of the SoundBite bone conduction devices in adults with single-sided deafness].
    Xi X; Zhao AR; Pang XH; Zhang LH; Wang Q; Wang Y; Su YY; Yuan LD; Zhao Q; Shi Q
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 May; 56(5):478-486. PubMed ID: 34011002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.
    Linstrom CJ; Silverman CA; Yu GP
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Apr; 119(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 19266579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The SoundBite hearing system: patient-assessed safety and benefit study.
    Gurgel RK; Shelton C
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Nov; 123(11):2807-12. PubMed ID: 23856912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term benefit and sound localization in patients with single-sided deafness rehabilitated with an osseointegrated bone-conduction device.
    Saroul N; Akkari M; Pavier Y; Gilain L; Mom T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 23202156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Baha system in patients with single-sided deafness and contralateral hearing loss.
    Wazen JJ; Van Ess MJ; Alameda J; Ortega C; Modisett M; Pinsky K
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Apr; 142(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 20304277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 2 implantable bone conduction devices in patients with single-sided deafness using a daily alternating method.
    Desmet JB; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1018-26. PubMed ID: 22772008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel intraoral bone conduction hearing prosthesis: one-year safety and efficacy study.
    Gurgel RK; Curtis SH; Shelton C
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 25275866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone-anchored hearing aid subjective benefit for unilateral deafness.
    House JW; Kutz JW; Chung J; Fisher LM
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Mar; 120(3):601-7. PubMed ID: 20131363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of single-sided deafness with the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Yuen HW; Bodmer D; Smilsky K; Nedzelski JM; Chen JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Jul; 141(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 19559952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postoperative validation of bone-anchored implants in the single-sided deafness population.
    Snapp H; Angeli S; Telischi FF; Fabry D
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 22314919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral routing of signal hearing aid versus transcutaneous bone conduction in single-sided deafness.
    Leterme G; Bernardeschi D; Bensemman A; Coudert C; Portal JJ; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Vicaut E; Frachet B; Bozorg Grayeli A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 26021779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of factors predicting the success of the bone conduction device headband trial in patients with single-sided deafness.
    Faber HT; Kievit H; de Wolf MJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF; Hol MK
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Dec; 138(12):1129-35. PubMed ID: 23247232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiological Results in SSD With an Active Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Implant at a Retrosigmoidal Position.
    Salcher R; Zimmermann D; Giere T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jun; 38(5):642-647. PubMed ID: 28375939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study in Single Sided Deafness on the New Non-Invasive Adhesive Bone Conduction Hearing System.
    Mertens G; Gilles A; Bouzegta R; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Sep; 39(8):940-949. PubMed ID: 30020266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of SoundBite Bone Conduction Hearing Aids on Speech Recognition and Quality of Life in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness.
    Luo Q; Shen Y; Chen T; Zheng Z; Shi H; Feng Y; Chen Z
    Neural Plast; 2020; 2020():4106949. PubMed ID: 32963516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term subjective benefit with a bone conduction implant sound processor in 44 patients with single-sided deafness.
    Desmet J; Wouters K; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jul; 35(6):1017-25. PubMed ID: 24751733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.