These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21221563)

  • 1. Statement by MITA on behalf of the MITA CR-DR group of the X-ray section.
    Vastagh S
    Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):566. PubMed ID: 21221563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image Gently pediatric digital radiography summit: executive summary.
    Don S; Goske MJ; John S; Whiting B; Willis CE
    Pediatr Radiol; 2011 May; 41(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 21253718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing digital radiography of children.
    Willis CE
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 19345030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reduction of the necessary dosage in x-ray diagnosis].
    Gudden F; Kuhn H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1992 Feb; 45(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 1561546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image Gently 5 years later: what goals remain to be accomplished in radiation protection for children?
    Goske MJ; Applegate KE; Bulas D; Butler PF; Callahan MJ; Don S; Farley S; Frush D; Hernanz-Schulman M; John SD; Kaste SC; Kaupp S; McElveny C; Morrison G; Sidhu M; Strauss K; Treves ST
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 22915386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strategies for dose reduction in ordinary radiographic examinations using CR and DR.
    Willis CE
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S196-200; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
    Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
    Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best practices in digital radiography.
    Herrmann TL; Fauber TL; Gill J; Hoffman C; Orth DK; Peterson PA; Prouty RR; Woodward AP; Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2012; 84(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 22988267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Specific features of high-voltage microfocal medical X-ray diagnosis].
    Potrakhov NN; Griaznov AIu
    Med Tekh; 2005; (5):14-9. PubMed ID: 16285240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Dosimetric characteristics of a slotted digital x-ray unit as a device with reduced radiation exposure].
    Stavitskiĭ RV; Mishkinis BIa; Volobuev AI; Denisov PI; Lapina TV
    Med Tekh; 1989; (2):23-6. PubMed ID: 2747495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital systems require x-ray charts too.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 67(4):354. PubMed ID: 8778917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiation protection guidelines for the practicing orthodontist.
    Mupparapu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):168-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 16102399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of digital technologies to decrease the radiation exposure from X-ray diagnostics to the population of Ukraine.
    Kovalenko Y; Miroshnychenko S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):98-9. PubMed ID: 20223851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system.
    Morin RL; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT dose: medical residents take note.
    Slothus RJ
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 82(2):112. PubMed ID: 21048061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.