340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21222571)
1. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Aaltomaa S; Välimaa T; Talja M
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 21222571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Drainage and antireflux characteristics of a biodegradable self-reinforced, self-expanding X-ray-positive poly-L,D-lactide spiral partial ureteral stent: an experimental study.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Kauppinen T; Talja M; Alhava E; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1559-64. PubMed ID: 18186698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New bioabsorbable polylactide ureteral stent in the treatment of ureteral lesions: an experimental study.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Tunninen V; Ala-Opas M; Talja M; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
J Endourol; 1999 Mar; 13(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10213104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow dynamics in a stented ureter.
Siggers JH; Waters S; Wattis J; Cummings L
Math Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 26(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 18990681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model.
Olweny EO; Landman J; Andreoni C; Collyer W; Kerbl K; Onciu M; Välimaa T; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2198-202. PubMed ID: 11956478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a New Design of Antireflux-biodegradable Ureteral Stent in Animal Model.
Soria F; Morcillo E; Serrano A; Budia A; Fernández I; Fernández-Aparicio T; Sanchez-Margallo FM
Urology; 2018 May; 115():59-64. PubMed ID: 29470998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.
Krebs A; Deane LA; Borin JF; Edwards RA; Sala LG; Khan F; Abdelshehid C; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The morphological, in situ effects of a self-reinforced bioabsorbable polylactide (SR-PLA 96) ureteric stent; an experimental study.
Lumiaho J; Heino A; Pietiläinen T; Ala-Opas M; Talja M; Välimaa T; Törmälä P
J Urol; 2000 Oct; 164(4):1360-3. PubMed ID: 10992415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preliminary Assessment of a New Antireflux Ureteral Stent Design in Swine Model.
Soria F; Morcillo E; Serrano A; Rioja J; Budia A; Moreno J; Sanchez-Margallo FM
Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):417-22. PubMed ID: 26189140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a Polymeric Flap Valve-Attached Ureteral Stent for Preventing Vesicoureteral Reflux in Elevated Intravesical Pressure Conditions: A Pilot Study Using a Porcine Model.
Kim HW; Park CJ; Seo S; Park Y; Lee JZ; Shin DG; Moon HS; Lee JH
J Endourol; 2016 Apr; 30(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 26577243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Complications of double J ureteral stents].
el Khader K
J Urol (Paris); 1996; 102(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 9091568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of a biodegradable ureteral stent versus the traditional double-J stent for the treatment of ureteral injury: an experimental study.
Fu WJ; Wang ZX; Li G; Cui FZ; Zhang Y; Zhang X
Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 7(6):065002. PubMed ID: 23047290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in patients with self-retaining ureteral stents: implications for upper urinary tract instillation.
Yossepowitch O; Lifshitz DA; Dekel Y; Ehrlich Y; Gur U; Margel D; Livne PM; Baniel J
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):890-3. PubMed ID: 15711312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of a novel degradable ureteral stent in a porcine model.
Hadaschik BA; Paterson RF; Fazli L; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Chew BH
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1161-6. PubMed ID: 18639278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Urodynamic study of obstruction induced by vesicoureteral reflux surgery with submucosal advance in beagle female dogs].
Guillonneau B; Wetzel O; Buzelin JM
Prog Urol; 1995 Dec; 5(6):933-40; discussion 940-1. PubMed ID: 8777400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental Assessment of New Generation of Ureteral Stents: Biodegradable and Antireflux Properties.
Soria F; de la Cruz JE; Budia A; Serrano A; Galan-Llopis JA; Sanchez-Margallo FM
J Endourol; 2020 Mar; 34(3):359-365. PubMed ID: 31931610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Next generation biodegradable ureteral stent in a yucatan pig model.
Chew BH; Lange D; Paterson RF; Hendlin K; Monga M; Clinkscales KW; Shalaby SW; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):765-71. PubMed ID: 20022028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative assessment of biodegradable-antireflux heparine coated ureteral stent: animal model study.
Soria F; de La Cruz JE; Caballero-Romeu JP; Pamplona M; Pérez-Fentes D; Resel-Folskerma L; Sanchez-Margallo FM
BMC Urol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):32. PubMed ID: 33639905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Malignant ureteral obstruction: preliminary results of treatment with metallic self-expandable stents.
Flueckiger F; Lammer J; Klein GE; Hausegger K; Lederer A; Szolar D; Tamussino K
Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 8416559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a new polytetrafluoroethylene-covered metallic stent to a noncovered stent in canine ureters.
Chung HH; Lee SH; Cho SB; Park HS; Kim YS; Kang BC; Frisoli JK; Razavi MK
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):619-28. PubMed ID: 18214599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
