These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2122265)

  • 1. [In-vitro fertilization in economic perspective].
    Haan G; van Steen RH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Oct; 134(43):2098-102. PubMed ID: 2122265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costs in relation to effects of in-vitro fertilization.
    Haan G; van Steen R
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Aug; 7(7):982-6. PubMed ID: 1430141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cost of a successful delivery with in vitro fertilization.
    Neumann PJ; Gharib SD; Weinstein MC
    N Engl J Med; 1994 Jul; 331(4):239-43. PubMed ID: 8015571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic implications of insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization in the United States. A review.
    Omurtag KR; Styer AK; Session D; Toth TL
    J Reprod Med; 2009; 54(11-12):661-8. PubMed ID: 20120898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost analysis of in vitro fertilization.
    Stern Z; Laufer N; Levy R; Ben-Shushan D; Mor-Yosef S
    Isr J Med Sci; 1995 Aug; 31(8):492-6. PubMed ID: 7635699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Tubal sterility. Attempt at cost-benefit comparison between in vitro fertilization and surgery].
    Querleu D; Boutteville C; Hedon B; Thomas-Desrousseaux P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1987; 16(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 2953777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro fertilization (IVF) versus gonadotropins followed by IVF as treatment for primary infertility: a cost-based decision analysis.
    Kansal-Kalra S; Milad MP; Grobman WA
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Sep; 84(3):600-4. PubMed ID: 16169391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [In-vitro fertilization in The Netherlands].
    Helmerhorst FM; Keirse MJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Oct; 134(43):2077-80. PubMed ID: 2234185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary therapy for tubal disease: surgery versus IVF.
    Gocial B
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1995; 40(6):297-302. PubMed ID: 8748918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reproduction in the year 2012: in vivo or in vitro?].
    van den Boogaard NM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(36):A4438. PubMed ID: 22951126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individualized cost-effective conventional ovulation induction treatment in normogonadotrophic anovulatory infertility (WHO group 2).
    Eijkemans MJ; Polinder S; Mulders AG; Laven JS; Habbema JD; Fauser BC
    Hum Reprod; 2005 Oct; 20(10):2830-7. PubMed ID: 16006473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Indications for in vitro fertilization: comparison of the Dutch guidelines with the published evidence].
    Bouwmans CA; Grijseels EW; Braat DD; Evers JL; Hemrika DJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Dec; 146(49):2339-42. PubMed ID: 12510395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint.
    Polinder S; Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Habbema JD; Fauser BJ; Eijkemans MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Feb; 23(2):316-23. PubMed ID: 18033807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Fertility treatments: possibilities for fewer multiple births and lower costs--the 'Umbrella' study].
    Merkus JM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 May; 150(21):1162-4. PubMed ID: 16768277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic evaluation of infertility treatment for tubal disease.
    Granberg M; Strandell A; Thorburn J; Daya S; Wikland M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2003 Aug; 20(8):301-8. PubMed ID: 12948091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Publication of the results in all Dutch centers for in vitro fertilization: an important step towards an improvement in the effectiveness of the treatment].
    Fauser BC
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Dec; 146(49):2335-8. PubMed ID: 12510394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.
    Bouwmans CA; Lintsen BM; Eijkemans MJ; Habbema JD; Braat DD; Hakkaart L
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):331-41. PubMed ID: 17662286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Tubal sterility: fertilization in vitro or surgery?].
    Pouly JL; Mage G; Pouly-Vye P; Janny L; Canis M; Bruhat MA
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 Apr; 25(4):I-IV. PubMed ID: 9229511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer during natural cycles.
    Ng EH; Chui DK; Tang OS; Lau EY; Yeung WS; Chung HP
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Feb; 46(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11255822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preimplantation genetic screening in older women: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Mersereau JE; Plunkett BA; Cedars MI
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 18001724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.