133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21223608)
1. Ethical and legal issues in enhancement research on human subjects.
Mehlman MJ; Berg JW; Juengst ET; Kodish E
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 21223608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects.
Kopelman LM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Coercion and the SATURN study.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Making all the children above average: ethical and regulatory concerns for pediatricians in pediatric enhancement research.
Berg JW; Mehlman MJ; Rubin DB; Kodish E
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2009 Jun; 48(5):472-80. PubMed ID: 19164131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in taking neuroscience research from bench to bedside.
Leshner AI
Cerebrum; 2004; 6(4):66-72. PubMed ID: 15986537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Author response to letter regarding "Children in clinical research: a conflict of moral values" (AJOB 3:1).
Sharav VH
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):W35-7. PubMed ID: 16192118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical testing: issues and ethics.
Mossman KL
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):90-101. PubMed ID: 12962094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
Capron AM
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.
Addicott DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics. Testing pesticides on humans given qualified endorsement.
Kaiser J
Science; 2004 Feb; 303(5662):1272-3. PubMed ID: 14988526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Historical vulnerability and special scrutiny: precautions against discrimination in medical research.
Silvers A
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):56-7; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI research proposals involving child subjects: concerns hindering research ethics boards from approving them and a checklist to help evaluate them.
Shiloff JD; Magwood B; Malisza KL
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Jan; 20(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 21223616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The IRB's role in assessing the generalizability of non-NIH-funded clinical trials.
Weijer C
IRB; 1998; 20(2-3):1-5. PubMed ID: 11656912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test.
Wendler D; Miller FG
J Med Ethics; 2007 Aug; 33(8):481-6. PubMed ID: 17664310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research: a position paper.
High DM; Whitehouse PJ; Post SG; Berg L
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):66-74. PubMed ID: 11657676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Some questionable premises about research ethics.
Macklin R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):29-31; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "What is legal is not necessarily ethical": the limits of law and drug-testing programs.
Luna E
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15035947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.
Levine RJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
