BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21224423)

  • 1. The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys.
    Bosmans JM; Weyler JJ; De Schepper AM; Parizel PM
    Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 21224423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of Radiology Reports for Intensive Care Unit Portable Chest Radiographs: Perceptions and Preferences of Radiologists and ICU Practitioners.
    Mortani Barbosa EJ; Lynch MC; Langlotz CP; Gefter WB
    J Thorac Imaging; 2016 Jan; 31(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 26258599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A picture is worth a thousand words: needs assessment for multimedia radiology reports in a large tertiary care medical center.
    Nayak L; Beaulieu CF; Rubin DL; Lipson JA
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1577-83. PubMed ID: 24200485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content.
    Naik SS; Hanbidge A; Wilson SR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Mar; 176(3):591-8. PubMed ID: 11222186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A SURVEY OF RADIOLOGISTS AND REFERRING VETERINARIANS REGARDING IMAGING REPORTS.
    Weissman A; Solano M; Taeymans O; Holmes SP; Jiménez D; Barton B
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2016; 57(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 26677167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How should radiologists reply when patients ask about their diagnoses? A survey of radiologists' and clinicians' preferences.
    Levitsky DB; Frank MS; Richardson ML; Shneidman RJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Aug; 161(2):433-6. PubMed ID: 8333389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls.
    Bosmans JM; Schrans D; Avonts D; De Maeseneer JM
    JBR-BTR; 2014; 97(6):325-30. PubMed ID: 25786285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers.
    Bassett LW; Bomyea K; Liu S; Sayre J
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):235-8. PubMed ID: 7892477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferences of referring physicians regarding the role of radiologists as direct communicators of test results.
    Erdoğan N; İmamoğlu H; Görkem SB; Doğan S; Şenol S; Öztürk A
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2017; 23(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 27876683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image-Rich Radiology Reports: A Value-Based Model to Improve Clinical Workflow.
    Patel BN; Lopez JM; Jiang BG; Roth CJ; Nelson RC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Jan; 14(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 27692807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers.
    Bosmans JM; Weyler JJ; Parizel PM
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):354-8. PubMed ID: 18667286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The radiology report--are we getting the message across?
    Wallis A; McCoubrie P
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1015-22. PubMed ID: 21788016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target.
    Johnson AJ; Ying J; Swan JS; Williams LS; Applegate KE; Littenberg B
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):497-505. PubMed ID: 17411639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two methods to transmit clinical history information from referring providers to radiologists.
    Agarwal R; Bleshman MH; Langlotz CP
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Nov; 6(11):795-9. PubMed ID: 19878887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preferences for structured reporting of measurement data: an institutional survey of medical oncologists, oncology registrars, and radiologists.
    Travis AR; Sevenster M; Ganesh R; Peters JF; Chang PJ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):785-96. PubMed ID: 24809319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
    Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations influencing interventional radiology in Canada: results of a national survey by the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA).
    O'Brien J; Baerlocher MO; Asch MR; Hayeems E; Kachura JR; Collingwood P
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(5):847-53. PubMed ID: 17533531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in Perceptions Among Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Regarding Language for Incidental Findings Reporting.
    Rosenkrantz AB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):140-143. PubMed ID: 27657356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports.
    Plumb AA; Grieve FM; Khan SH
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Apr; 64(4):386-94; 395-6. PubMed ID: 19264183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of radiologists' communication with other clinicians--As experienced by radiologists.
    Fatahi N; Krupic F; Hellström M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Jun; 98(6):722-7. PubMed ID: 25766732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.