BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21224772)

  • 1. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
    Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain.
    Cunningham BW; Sefter JC; Hu N; Kim SW; Bridwell KH; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):E198-205. PubMed ID: 20195199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.
    Wang T; Liu H; Zheng Z; Li Z; Wang J; Shrivastava SS; Yang H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jul; 38(15):E925-9. PubMed ID: 23609200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is pelvic fixation the only option to provide additional stability to the sacral anchorage in long lumbar instrumentation? A comparative biomechanical study of new techniques.
    Volkheimer D; Reichel H; Wilke HJ; Lattig F
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Mar; 43():34-39. PubMed ID: 28199880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
    Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
    Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
    Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
    Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Biomechanical effects of iliac screw plates on stability of lumbo-iliac fixation construct].
    Wang L; Pan H; Yu B; Xie C; Xu Y; Zheng Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(5):606-11. PubMed ID: 23879102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
    Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains.
    Fleischer GD; Kim YJ; Ferrara LA; Freeman AL; Boachie-Adjei O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Feb; 37(3):E163-9. PubMed ID: 21857409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
    Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
    Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanics of lateral plate and pedicle screw constructs in lumbar spines instrumented at two levels with laterally placed interbody cages.
    Nayak AN; Gutierrez S; Billys JB; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1331-8. PubMed ID: 23685215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The stability of reconstruction methods after thoracolumbar total spondylectomy. An in vitro investigation.
    Oda I; Cunningham BW; Abumi K; Kaneda K; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Aug; 24(16):1634-8. PubMed ID: 10472096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segmental motion adjacent to an instrumented lumbar fusion: the effect of extension of fusion to the sacrum.
    Untch C; Liu Q; Hart R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):2376-81. PubMed ID: 15507798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive biomechanical analysis of three reconstruction techniques following total sacrectomy: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Macki M; De la Garza-Ramos R; Murgatroyd AA; Mullinix KP; Sun X; Cunningham BW; McCutcheon BA; Bydon M; Gokaslan ZL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):570-577. PubMed ID: 28777063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
    Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 59.