These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21225142)

  • 1. Effect of age on proximal esophageal response to swallowing.
    Dantas RO; Alves LM; Dalmazo J; Santos CM; Cassiani Rde A; Nascimento WV
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2010; 47(4):339-43. PubMed ID: 21225142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender differences in proximal esophageal contractions.
    Dantas RO; Alves LM; Cassiani Rde A
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2009; 46(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 20232007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of bolus volume on proximal esophageal contractions of patients with Chagas' disease and patients with idiopathic achalasia.
    Dantas RO; Alves LM; Nascimento WV
    Dis Esophagus; 2010 Nov; 23(8):670-4. PubMed ID: 20545981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in response of the proximal esophagus to wet swallows in patients of Chagas' disease and idiopathic achalasia.
    Ramos RI; Varrica LM; Dantas RO
    Dis Esophagus; 2006; 19(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 16984540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Solid swallowing versus water swallowing: manometric study of dysphagia.
    Keren S; Argaman E; Golan M
    Dig Dis Sci; 1992 Apr; 37(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 1551353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential swallows have no influence on esophageal contractions of patients with iron deficiency anemia.
    Dantas RO; Miranda AL
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2004; 41(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15499421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between distension-contraction waveforms during esophageal peristalsis: effect of bolus volume, viscosity, and posture.
    Mittal RK; Muta K; Ledgerwood-Lee M; Zifan A
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2020 Oct; 319(4):G454-G461. PubMed ID: 32755311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the catheter diameter on the investigation of the esophageal motility through solid-state high-resolution manometry.
    Xiang X; Tu L; Zhang X; Xie X; Hou X
    Dis Esophagus; 2013; 26(7):661-7. PubMed ID: 23384164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esophageal contractions and oropharyngeal and esophageal transits in patients with iron deficiency anemia.
    Miranda AL; Dantas RO
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1000-4. PubMed ID: 12809819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry in healthy volunteers.
    Chen CL; Yi CH; Chou AS; Liu TT
    Dis Esophagus; 2013 Jan; 26(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 22394249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response of the esophageal body to wet and dry swallows in Chagas' disease.
    Dantas RO; Aprile LR
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2008; 45(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 18852945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of "abnormal" contractions.
    Richter JE; Wu WC; Johns DN; Blackwell JN; Nelson JL; Castell JA; Castell DO
    Dig Dis Sci; 1987 Jun; 32(6):583-92. PubMed ID: 3568945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ALTERED ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY DURING PERCEPTION OF BOLUS TRANSIT IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS.
    Costa TV; Dantas RO
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(4):386-389. PubMed ID: 31800734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of esophageal motility in response to bread swallows and water swallows.
    Johnston BT; Collins JS; McFarland RJ; Blackwell JN; Love AH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Mar; 88(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 8438839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of effortful swallow on pharyngeal manometric measurements during saliva and water swallowing in healthy participants.
    Witte U; Huckabee ML; Doeltgen SH; Gumbley F; Robb M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 May; 89(5):822-8. PubMed ID: 18452727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of axial force and manometric recordings in the oesophagus during wet and dry swallows.
    Gravesen FH; Gregersen H; Arendt-Nielsen L; Drewes AM
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2010 Feb; 22(2):142-9, e46-7. PubMed ID: 19706069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Muscle shortening along the normal esophagus during swallowing.
    Dai Q; Korimilli A; Thangada VK; Chung CY; Parkman H; Brasseur J; Miller LS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 16416220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans.
    Castell JA; Dalton CB; Castell DO
    Am J Physiol; 1990 Feb; 258(2 Pt 1):G173-8. PubMed ID: 2305883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of ageing on oesophageal motility after ingestion of liquids with different viscosities.
    Ferriolli E; Dantas RO; Oliveira RB; Braga FJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1996 Aug; 8(8):793-8. PubMed ID: 8864677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressure topography metrics for high-resolution pharyngeal-esophageal manofluorography-a normative study of younger and older adults.
    Nativ-Zeltzer N; Logemann JA; Zecker SG; Kahrilas PJ
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 May; 28(5):721-31. PubMed ID: 26822009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.