159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21225361)
1. 64-Slice CT urography: optimisation of radiation dose.
Martingano P; Stacul F; Cavallaro MF; Cernic S; Bregant P; Cova MA
Radiol Med; 2011 Apr; 116(3):417-31. PubMed ID: 21225361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-dose CT urography using deep learning image reconstruction: a prospective study for comparison with conventional CT urography.
Cheng Y; Han Y; Li J; Fan G; Cao L; Li J; Jia X; Yang J; Guo J
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20201291. PubMed ID: 33571034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low tube voltage computed tomography urography using low-concentration contrast media: Comparison of image quality in conventional computed tomography urography.
Hwang I; Cho JY; Kim SY; Oh SJ; Ku JH; Lee J; Kim SH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2454-63. PubMed ID: 26388465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose in computed tomography urography following tube voltage optimisation.
Saidu AM; Garba I; Abba M; Yahuza MA; Yusuf L; Tahir NM; Garko SS
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):301-307. PubMed ID: 38071938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low-Tube-Voltage CT Urography Using Low-Concentration-Iodine Contrast Media and Iterative Reconstruction: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparison with Conventional CT Urography.
Kim SY; Cho JY; Lee J; Hwang SI; Moon MH; Lee EJ; Hong SS; Kim CK; Kim KA; Park SB; Sung DJ; Kim Y; Kim YM; Jung SI; Rha SE; Kim DW; Lee H; Shim Y; Hwang I; Woo S; Choi HJ
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(6):1119-1129. PubMed ID: 30386143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-source spiral CT with pitch up to 3.2 and 75 ms temporal resolution: image reconstruction and assessment of image quality.
Flohr TG; Leng S; Yu L; Aiimendinger T; Bruder H; Petersilka M; Eusemann CD; Stierstorfer K; Schmidt B; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5641-53. PubMed ID: 20095277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-detector CT urography: a one-stop renal and urinary tract imaging modality.
Dillman JR; Caoili EM; Cohan RH
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 17597338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cutting down the radiation dose on CT urography: how it is done and what results are received?
Al-Amin M; Dyakov I; Vassileva J; Hadjidekov V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):172-4. PubMed ID: 25848106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Split-Bolus Portal Venous Phase Dual-Energy CT Urography: Protocol Design, Image Quality, and Dose Reduction.
Chen CY; Hsu JS; Jaw TS; Shih MC; Lee LJ; Tsai TH; Liu GC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):W492-501. PubMed ID: 26496571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT urography in the urinary bladder: to compare excretory phase images using a low noise index and a high noise index with adaptive noise reduction filter.
Takeyama N; Ohgiya Y; Hayashi T; Takahashi T; Yoshiaki S; Takasu D; Nakashima J; Kato K; Kinebuchi Y; Hashimoto T; Gokan T
Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 21508198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationships of clinical protocols and reconstruction kernels with image quality and radiation dose in a 128-slice CT scanner: study with an anthropomorphic and water phantom.
Paul J; Krauss B; Banckwitz R; Maentele W; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):e699-703. PubMed ID: 21316888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-dose MDCT urography: feasibility study of low-tube-voltage technique and adaptive noise reduction filter.
Yanaga Y; Awai K; Funama Y; Nakaura T; Hirai T; Roux S; Yamashita Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):W220-9. PubMed ID: 19696263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-high-resolution CT urography: Importance of matrix size and reconstruction technique on image quality.
Nakamoto A; Hori M; Onishi H; Ota T; Fukui H; Ogawa K; Yano K; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130():109148. PubMed ID: 32623268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determination of optimal imaging settings for urolithiasis CT using filtered back projection (FBP), statistical iterative reconstruction (IR) and knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction (IMR): a physical human phantom study.
Choi SY; Ahn SH; Choi JD; Kim JH; Lee BI; Kim JI; Park SB
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150527. PubMed ID: 26577542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
