BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21226895)

  • 1. Shape-based peak identification for ChIP-Seq.
    Hower V; Evans SN; Pachter L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():15. PubMed ID: 21226895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Software for rapid time dependent ChIP-sequencing analysis (TDCA).
    Myschyshyn M; Farren-Dai M; Chuang TJ; Vocadlo D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):521. PubMed ID: 29178831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of Enriched Regions in ChIP-Seq Data via a Linear-Time Multi-Level Thresholding Algorithm.
    Naik M; Rueda L; Vasighizaker A
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(5):2842-2850. PubMed ID: 34398762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CMT: a constrained multi-level thresholding approach for ChIP-Seq data analysis.
    Rezaeian I; Rueda L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93873. PubMed ID: 24736605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discovering transcription factor binding sites in highly repetitive regions of genomes with multi-read analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
    Chung D; Kuan PF; Li B; Sanalkumar R; Liang K; Bresnick EH; Dewey C; Keleş S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2011 Jul; 7(7):e1002111. PubMed ID: 21779159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HPeak: an HMM-based algorithm for defining read-enriched regions in ChIP-Seq data.
    Qin ZS; Yu J; Shen J; Maher CA; Hu M; Kalyana-Sundaram S; Yu J; Chinnaiyan AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jul; 11():369. PubMed ID: 20598134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
    Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AREM: aligning short reads from ChIP-sequencing by expectation maximization.
    Newkirk D; Biesinger J; Chon A; Yokomori K; Xie X
    J Comput Biol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1495-505. PubMed ID: 22035330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data.
    Jothi R; Cuddapah S; Barski A; Cui K; Zhao K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Sep; 36(16):5221-31. PubMed ID: 18684996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. OccuPeak: ChIP-Seq peak calling based on internal background modelling.
    de Boer BA; van Duijvenboden K; van den Boogaard M; Christoffels VM; Barnett P; Ruijter JM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99844. PubMed ID: 24936875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decoding ChIP-seq with a double-binding signal refines binding peaks to single-nucleotides and predicts cooperative interaction.
    Gomes AL; Abeel T; Peterson M; Azizi E; Lyubetskaya A; Carvalho L; Galagan J
    Genome Res; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1686-97. PubMed ID: 25024162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PeakRanger: a cloud-enabled peak caller for ChIP-seq data.
    Feng X; Grossman R; Stein L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():139. PubMed ID: 21554709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
    Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CNV-guided multi-read allocation for ChIP-seq.
    Zhang Q; Keleş S
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(20):2860-7. PubMed ID: 24966364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of algorithm performance in ChIP-seq peak detection.
    Wilbanks EG; Facciotti MT
    PLoS One; 2010 Jul; 5(7):e11471. PubMed ID: 20628599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Saturation analysis of ChIP-seq data for reproducible identification of binding peaks.
    Hansen P; Hecht J; Ibrahim DM; Krannich A; Truss M; Robinson PN
    Genome Res; 2015 Sep; 25(9):1391-400. PubMed ID: 26163319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel statistical method for quantitative comparison of multiple ChIP-seq datasets.
    Chen L; Wang C; Qin ZS; Wu H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):1889-96. PubMed ID: 25682068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for GC-content bias reduces systematic errors and batch effects in ChIP-seq data.
    Teng M; Irizarry RA
    Genome Res; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1930-1938. PubMed ID: 29025895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ChIP-R: Assembling reproducible sets of ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq peaks from multiple replicates.
    Newell R; Pienaar R; Balderson B; Piper M; Essebier A; Bodén M
    Genomics; 2021 Jul; 113(4):1855-1866. PubMed ID: 33878366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins.
    Kharchenko PV; Tolstorukov MY; Park PJ
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1351-9. PubMed ID: 19029915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.