These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21227485)
1. Evaluation of failure risks in ceramic restorations for endodontically treated premolar with MOD preparation. Lin CL; Chang YH; Pai CA Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 21227485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of the risk of failure for an endodontically treated maxillary premolar with MODP preparation and CAD/CAM ceramic restorations. Lin CL; Chang YH; Pa CA J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1391-5. PubMed ID: 19801237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Lin CL; Chang YH; Chang CY; Pai CA; Huang SF Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Feb; 118(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20156270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth. Ausiello P; Franciosa P; Martorelli M; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 21227484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical behavior of post-restored upper canine teeth: a 3D FE analysis. Ausiello P; Franciosa P; Martorelli M; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1285-94. PubMed ID: 22000641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of elastic modulus mismatch between tooth and post and core restorations on root fracture. Ona M; Wakabayashi N; Yamazaki T; Takaichi A; Igarashi Y Int Endod J; 2013 Jan; 46(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 22775227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar. Seow LL; Toh CG; Wilson NH Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 16011232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new method to test the fracture probability of all-ceramic crowns with a dual-axis chewing simulator. Heintze SD; Albrecht T; Cavalleri A; Steiner M Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):e10-9. PubMed ID: 20932564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Magne P Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth. Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns. De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study. Kowalczyk P Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis. Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Apicella D; Valentino B; Ferrari M; Aversa R; Apicella A Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1035-44. PubMed ID: 16406084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining structural-thermal coupled field FE analysis and the Taguchi method to evaluate the relative contributions of multi-factors in a premolar adhesive MOD restoration. Lin CL; Chang YH; Lin YF J Dent; 2008 Aug; 36(8):626-36. PubMed ID: 18550252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study. Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of metal- and galvano-ceramic crowns cemented with different luting cements: in vitro comparative study. Ghazy MH; Madina MM Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):610-2. PubMed ID: 17165302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]