These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21227618)
1. Reading screening mammograms--attitudes among radiologists and radiographers about skill mix. Johansen LW; Brodersen J Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e325-30. PubMed ID: 21227618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An investigation of radiographers' and radiologists' perceptions and attitudes in Kuwait towards extending radiographers' role in mammography. Muhanna AM; Brown PN; Pratt S Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):325-332. PubMed ID: 34782216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Implications and details of the responsibility of radiologists in organized screening activities]. Demuth R; Hazebroucq V; Schwebag MM Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb; 2006; (1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16869095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can radiographers read screening mammograms? Wivell G; Denton ER; Eve CB; Inglis JC; Harvey I Clin Radiol; 2003 Jan; 58(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12565207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Radiologists and Radiographers in Double Reading Mammograms: The UK National Health Service Breast Screening Program. Chen Y; James JJ; Michalopoulou E; Darker IT; Jenkins J Radiology; 2023 Jan; 306(1):102-109. PubMed ID: 36098643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists. Torres-Mejía G; Smith RA; Carranza-Flores Mde L; Bogart A; Martínez-Matsushita L; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Ortega-Olvera C; Montemayor-Varela E; Angeles-Llerenas A; Bautista-Arredondo S; Sánchez-González G; Martínez-Montañez OG; Uscanga-Sánchez SR; Lazcano-Ponce E; Hernández-Ávila M BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():410. PubMed ID: 25975383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographers' perception on task shifting to nurses and assistant nurses within the radiography profession. Møller Christensen B; Pettersson T; Bjällmark A Radiography (Lond); 2021 May; 27(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 32958399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions. Pauli R; Hammond S; Cooke J; Ansell J Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):10-4. PubMed ID: 8785616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome. Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Groenewoud JH; van de Poll-Franse LV; Fracheboud J; Coebergh JW Br J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 100(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 19259088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of a tele-training programme on radiographers in the interpretation of CT colonography. Lauridsen C; Lefere P; Gerke O; Gryspeerdt S Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):851-6. PubMed ID: 21397422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations? Jackson SL; Cook AJ; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Brenner RJ; Elmore JG Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 22130089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography. Tanaka R; Takamori M; Uchiyama Y; Nishikawa RM; Shiraishi J Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565. PubMed ID: 25536443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting radiographers in Norway - A qualitative interview study. Berntsen A; Myklebust AM; Kjelle E Radiography (Lond); 2023 Mar; 29(2):450-455. PubMed ID: 36812792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementing supplementary breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: Insights from European radiographers and radiologists. Mizzi D; Allely CS; Zarb F; Mercer CE Radiography (Lond); 2024 May; 30(3):908-919. PubMed ID: 38615593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations: selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist. Brealey S; Piper K; King D; Bland M; Caddick J; Campbell P; Gibbon A; Highland A; Jenkins N; Petty D; Warren D Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e597-605. PubMed ID: 23791130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Comparison of MRI Radiographers' Knowledge in Saudi Arabia and the Republic of Ireland in Relation to Image Quality Management, for Abdomen and Pelvic MRI Examinations. Al-Dahery S; McGee A; Rainford L J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):280-288. PubMed ID: 31176436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the results of a proficiency test in screening mammography at the CSPO of Florence: review of 705 tests. Ciatto S; Ambrogetti D; Morrone D; Del Turco MR Radiol Med; 2006 Sep; 111(6):797-803. PubMed ID: 16896561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of Full-quality DICOM Images Compared to Minimally Compressed Mammograms in JPEG Format for Radiology Training: A Study From Radiologist and Radiographer Perspectives. Trieu PDY; Barron M; Lewis SJ Acad Radiol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 36567143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]