These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21227709)
1. In vitro comparison of 1.5 mm vs. 2.0 mm screws for fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy. Scaf de Molon R; de Ávila ÉD; Scartezini GR; Bonini Campos JA; Vaz LG; Real Gabrielli MF; Pereira Filho VA J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 21227709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery. Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system. Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative biomechanical and photoelastic evaluation of different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement. Sato FR; Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):160-6. PubMed ID: 20006171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate. Pereira Filho VA; Iamashita HY; Monnazzi MS; Gabrielli MF; Vaz LG; Passeri LA Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 22898312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep. Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of different screw fixation techniques and screw diameters in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis method. Sindel A; Demiralp S; Colok G J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):683-91. PubMed ID: 24889187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback. Oh JS; Kim SG J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro biomechanical comparison of the effect of pattern, inclination, and size of positional screws on load resistance for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Zizelmann C; Hammer B; Gellrich NC; Kokemüller H; Bormann KH; Rohner D J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1458-63. PubMed ID: 21256651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method. Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement? Ureturk EU; Apaydin A J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles. Uckan S; Schwimmer A; Kummer F; Greenberg AM Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11437421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite-element-analysis of different screw-diameters in the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Maurer P; Holweg S; Schubert J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):365-72. PubMed ID: 10870755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Stability of screw fixation following sagittal splitting osteotomy of the mandibular ramus]. Eba M Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990; 19(3):356-76. PubMed ID: 2134896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro comparison of screw versus plate fixation in the sagittal split osteotomy. Foley WL; Beckman TW Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1992; 7(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 1291608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]