263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21227957)
1. Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors.
Obryk B; Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Budzanowski M; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):211-4. PubMed ID: 21227957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre- and post-irradiation fading effect for LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P materials used in routine monitoring.
Carinou E; Askounis P; Dimitropoulou F; Kiranos G; Kyrgiakou H; Nirgianaki E; Papadomarkaki E; Kamenopoulou V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):207-10. PubMed ID: 21199822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. UV-induced bleaching of deep traps in Harshaw TLD LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
Benevides L; Voss S; Nita I; Rotunda J; Velbeck K; Luo LZ; Moscovitch M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):199-201. PubMed ID: 21310735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the performance of the Harshaw™ DXTRAD LiF:Mg,Cu,P finger ring with two different thickness filters.
Baker ST; Roberts GH; Gilvin PJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):243-5. PubMed ID: 21212080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method for distinguishing between static and dynamic X-ray exposure of a personal TL-badge using the CCD camera TL reader.
Budzanowski M; Olko P; Golnik N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):259-62. PubMed ID: 16614092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual monitoring in nuclear medicine therapeutic procedures using extremity dosemeters LiF(Mg, Cu, P).
Sarti G; Del Dottore F; Fabbri C; Tassinari L; Pagan S; Rustignoli M; Motta P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):521-4. PubMed ID: 21030398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the performance of two LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P dosemeters for extremity monitoring.
Freire LC; Pereira MF; Calado AM; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):140-3. PubMed ID: 21081520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulated and measured Hp(10) response of the personal dosemeter Seibersdorf.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):166-9. PubMed ID: 17846027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term stability of Harshaw LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDS.
Gilvin PJ; Burkett RA; Baker ST; Garratt NJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):192-4. PubMed ID: 21216732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of whole-body personal TL dosemeters in mixed field beta-gamma radiation.
Ciupek K; Aksamit D; Wołoszczuk K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Nov; 162(1-2):20-3. PubMed ID: 25009188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of two extremity dosemeters based on LiF:Mg,Cu,P thin detectors for mixed beta-gamma fields.
Ginjaume M; Pérez S; Ortega X; Duch MA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):316-20. PubMed ID: 16644980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Method of thermoluminescent measurement of radiation doses from micrograys up to a megagray with a single LiF:Mg,Cu,P detector.
Obryk B; Bilski P; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):543-7. PubMed ID: 21051430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The applicability of the PTTL dose re-analysis method to the Harshaw LiF:Mg,Cu,P material.
Moscovitch M; Benevides L; Romanyukha A; Hull F; Duffy M; Voss S; Velbeck KJ; Nita I; Rotunda JE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):161-4. PubMed ID: 21450701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. TYPE TESTING OF LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETERS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF Hp(10) AND Hp(0.07).
Pereira JS; Pereira MF; Rangel S; Caldeira M; Carvalhal G; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 30496554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A whole-body dosimetry system for personal monitoring based on hot-pressed thin layer TLD.
Busch F; Engelhardt J; Martini E; Lesz J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):246-8. PubMed ID: 21227958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FADING EFFECT OF LiF:Mg,Ti AND LiF:Mg,Cu,P Ext-Rad AND WHOLE-BODY DETECTORS.
Pereira J; Pereira MF; Rangel S; Saraiva M; Santos LM; Cardoso JV; Alves JG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):177-80. PubMed ID: 26503857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors.
Olko P; Bilski P; El-Faramawy NA; Göksu HY; Kim JL; Kopec R; Waligórski MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):15-22. PubMed ID: 16644968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The application of LiF:Mg,Cu,P to large scale personnel dosimetry: current status and future directions.
Moscovitch M; St John TJ; Cassata JR; Blake PK; Rotunda JE; Ramlo M; Velbeck KJ; Luo LZ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):248-54. PubMed ID: 16835277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
