263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21227957)
21. Determination of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL efficiency for X-rays and their application to Monte Carlo simulations of dosemeter response.
Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):483-6. PubMed ID: 16822775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative study of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si and Li2B4O7:Cu,Ag,P TL detectors.
Miljanić S; Ranogajec-Komor M; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Prokić M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16709712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Identification of static exposure of standard dosimetric badge with thermoluminescent detectors.
Budzanowski M; Olko P; Kopeć R; Obryk B; Dzikiewicz-Sapiecha H; Siwicki R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):213-6. PubMed ID: 17038405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dosimetry of densely ionising radiation with three LiF phosphors for space applications.
Bilski P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):397-400. PubMed ID: 16731689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Batch homogeneity of LiF(Mg,Cu,P)-GR200 and LiF(Mg,Cu,P)-MCP-NS TL detectors for use as extremity dosemeters at ENEA personal dosimetry service.
Mariotti F; Uleri G; Fantuzzi E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):283-8. PubMed ID: 16702241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Energy response of a two-dimensional sheet-type LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL dosemeter to photons.
Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N; Ozasa N; Ishikawa Y
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):125-8. PubMed ID: 16614093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Synchrotron radiation in the study of the variation of dose response in thermoluminescence dosimeters with radiation energy.
Kron T; Smith A; Hyodo K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Thermoluminescent detectors applied in individual monitoring of radiation workers in Europe--a review based on the EURADOS questionnaire.
Olko P; Currivan L; van Dijk JW; Lopez MA; Wernli C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):298-302. PubMed ID: 16581929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A high-resolution map of gamma dose rates in Cluj County, Romania using LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors.
Dolha M; Timar-Gabor A; Dicu T; Begy R; Anton M; Cosma C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Nov; 162(1-2):14-9. PubMed ID: 25009186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the TL responses of two different preparations of LiF:Mg,Cu,P irradiated by photons of various energies.
González PR; Furetta C; Azorín J
Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Mar; 65(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 17085055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effects of ionisation density on the thermoluminescence response (efficiency) of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Horowitz Y; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):331-48. PubMed ID: 15273352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose levels of the occupational radiation exposures in Poland based on results from the accredited dosimetry service at the IFJ PAN, Krakow.
Budzanowski M; Kopeć R; Obryk B; Olko P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):107-10. PubMed ID: 21183549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Thermoluminescence dosimetry of a thermal neutron field and comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
Fernandes AC; Santos JP; Kling A; Marques JG; Gonçalves IC; Carvalho AF; Santos L; Cardoso J; Osvay M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 15367765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. APPLICATION OF PTTL METHOD FOR DOSE REASSESSMENT IN EXTREMITY DOSIMETRY.
Sas-Bieniarz A; Budzanowski M; Bubak A; Kopeć R
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):204-7. PubMed ID: 27143792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Personal monitor glass badge: theoretical dosemeter response calculated with the Monte Carlo transport code MCNPX.
Hocine N; Donadille L; Huet C; Itié C; Clairand I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):231-3. PubMed ID: 21335330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry.
Al-Haj A; Lagarde C; Mahyoub F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):399-402. PubMed ID: 17223633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. NUCLEAR HEATING IN LIF DOSEMETERS IN A FUSION NEUTRON FIELD, TRIAL OF DIRECT COMPARISON OF EXPERIMENTAL AND SIMULATED RESULTS.
Pohorecki W; Obryk B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Aug; 180(1-4):129-133. PubMed ID: 29036685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A personal thermoluminescence dosimeter using LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si detectors for photon fields.
Jung H; Lee KJ; Kim JL
Appl Radiat Isot; 2003 Jul; 59(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 12878128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the effects of exposure to light in Harshaw LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P.
Baker ST; Gilvin PJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):258-60. PubMed ID: 16980318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
