BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21228660)

  • 1. A three-arm (laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic) matched-case analysis of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.
    Patel CB; Ragupathi M; Ramos-Valadez DI; Haas EM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Feb; 54(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 21228660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study.
    Kwak JM; Kim SH; Kim J; Son DN; Baek SJ; Cho JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Feb; 54(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 21228661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally invasive rectal dissection: time to dock the robot.
    Prasad LM; Desouza AL
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Feb; 54(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 21228658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic and minimally invasive resection of malignant colorectal disease.
    Koopmann MC; Heise CP
    Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 88(5):1047-72, vii. PubMed ID: 18790154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome.
    Ng KH; Lim YK; Ho KS; Ooi BS; Eu KW
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 19710972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
    Khreiss W; Huebner M; Cima RR; Dozois ER; Chua HK; Pemberton JH; Harmsen WS; Larson DW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24819094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.
    Kang J; Yoon KJ; Min BS; Hur H; Baik SH; Kim NK; Lee KY
    Ann Surg; 2013 Jan; 257(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 23059496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Memon S; Heriot AG; Murphy DG; Bressel M; Lynch AC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2095-101. PubMed ID: 22350601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic rectal surgery: what are the benefits?
    Kim CW; Baik SH
    Minerva Chir; 2013 Oct; 68(5):457-69. PubMed ID: 24101003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
    Hellan M; Anderson C; Ellenhorn JD; Paz B; Pigazzi A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Nov; 14(11):3168-73. PubMed ID: 17763911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical aspects of robotic proctectomy.
    Peterson CY; McLemore EC; Horgan S; Talamini MA; Ramamoorthy SL
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Jun; 22(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 22678311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic surgery: colon and rectum.
    Baek SK; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A
    Cancer J; 2013; 19(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 23528722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ["Fast-Track" for laparoscopic-assisted rectum resection--what can be achieved? First results of a feasibility study].
    Spatz H; Zülke C; Beham A; Agha A; Bolder U; Krenz D; Fürst A; Lattermann R; Gröppner G; Hemmerich B; Piso P; Schlitt H
    Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Oct; 131(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 17089286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal surgery: a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Young MT; Menon G; Feldmann TF; Mills S; Carmichael J; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
    Am Surg; 2014 Oct; 80(10):1059-63. PubMed ID: 25264660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes.
    Park JS; Choi GS; Lim KH; Jang YS; Jun SH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Dec; 17(12):3195-202. PubMed ID: 20589436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Alimoglu O; Atak I; Orhun K; Eren T
    Minerva Chir; 2013 Oct; 68(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 24101004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive colectomy in elderly patients.
    Peters WR; Fleshman JW
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1995 Dec; 5(6):477-9. PubMed ID: 8611997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices.
    Huffmanm LC; Pandalai PK; Boulton BJ; James L; Starnes SL; Reed MF; Howington JA; Nussbaum MS
    Surgery; 2007 Oct; 142(4):613-8; discussion 618-20. PubMed ID: 17950356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.