These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21228956)

  • 21. Combining periodic and continuous sodium hypochlorite treatment to control biofilms in dental unit water systems.
    Karpay RI; Plamondon TJ; Mills SE; Dove SB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):957-65. PubMed ID: 10422399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the ActiDes-Blue and CARELA HYDRO-DES technology for the sanitation of contaminated cooling water systems in dental units.
    Kramer A; Lemanski S; Demond K; Assadian O
    GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip; 2012; 7(1):Doc09. PubMed ID: 22558043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Water cleaning systems improves the water quality in dental unit water lines (DUWL). A report from the Public Dental Health of Västra Götaland region, Sweden.
    Dahlén G; Hjort G; Spencer I
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(4):171-7. PubMed ID: 24620507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Functions of N-halamine Dental Unit Waterline Tubing for One Year.
    Porteous N; Dang S; Schoolfield J; Sun Y
    J Clin Dent; 2016 Mar; 27(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 28390212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Plasma Sterilization Effectively Reduces Bacterial Contamination in Dental Unit Waterlines.
    Noopan S; Unchui P; Techotinnakorn S; Ampornaramveth RS
    Int J Dent; 2019; 2019():5720204. PubMed ID: 31467546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A centralised, automated dental hospital water quality and biofilm management system using neutral Ecasol maintains dental unit waterline output at better than potable quality: a 2-year longitudinal study.
    O'Donnell MJ; Boyle M; Swan J; Russell RJ; Coleman DC
    J Dent; 2009 Oct; 37(10):748-62. PubMed ID: 19573971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The consistent application of hydrogen peroxide controls biofilm growth and removes
    Hoogenkamp MA; Mazurel D; Deutekom-Mulder E; de Soet JJ
    Biofilm; 2023 Dec; 5():100132. PubMed ID: 37346320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units.
    Montebugnoli L; Chersoni S; Prati C; Dolci G
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 15066741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Sterilox for controlling microbial biofilm contamination of dental water.
    Zhang W; Onyango O; Lin Z; Lee SS; Li Y
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Nov; 28(11):586-8, 590-2. PubMed ID: 18064783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multiparametric analysis of waterline contamination in dental units.
    Barbeau J; Tanguay R; Faucher E; Avezard C; Trudel L; Côté L; Prévost AP
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 Nov; 62(11):3954-9. PubMed ID: 8899982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Decontamination of dental unit waterlines using disinfectants and filters].
    Monarca S; Garusi G; Gigola P; Spampinato L; Zani C; Sapelli PL
    Minerva Stomatol; 2002 Oct; 51(10):451-9. PubMed ID: 12548184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reduction of bacterial levels in dental unit waterlines.
    Porteous NB; Cooley RL
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):630-4. PubMed ID: 15366526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laboratory evaluation of anti-biofilm agents for use in dental unit waterlines.
    Meiller TF; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; DePaola LG
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(4):97-103. PubMed ID: 11507923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of drying dental unit waterline biofilms on the bacterial load of dental unit water.
    Fiehn NE; Larsen T
    Int Dent J; 2002 Aug; 52(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 12212811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A pilot study of 2 methods for control of dental unit biofilms.
    Kim PJ; Cederberg RA; Puttaiah R
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 11203905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines.
    Souza-Gugelmin MC; Lima CD; Lima SN; Mian H; Ito IY
    Braz Dent J; 2003; 14(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 12656466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of a disinfectant/coolant irrigant on microbes isolated from dental unit water lines.
    Epstein JB; Dawson JR; Buivids IA; Wong B; Le ND
    Spec Care Dentist; 2002; 22(4):137-41. PubMed ID: 12449456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dental Unit Waterlines in Quito and Caracas Contaminated with Nontuberculous Mycobacteria: A Potential Health Risk in Dental Practice.
    Castellano Realpe OJ; Gutiérrez JC; Sierra DA; Pazmiño Martínez LA; Prado Palacios YY; Echeverría G; de Waard JH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32244267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microbial quality of water in dental unit waterlines.
    Nikaeen M; Hatamzadeh M; Sabzevari Z; Zareh O
    J Res Med Sci; 2009 Sep; 14(5):297-300. PubMed ID: 21772899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.
    Agahi RH; Hashemipour MA; Kalantari M; Ayatollah-Mosavi A; Aghassi H; Nassab AH
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 May; 11(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 25097645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.