133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21229340)
1. Performance of three estimation methods in repeated time-to-event modeling.
Karlsson KE; Plan EL; Karlsson MO
AAPS J; 2011 Mar; 13(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 21229340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of FOCEI and SAEM Estimation Methods in Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using NONMEM
Sukarnjanaset W; Wattanavijitkul T; Jarurattanasirikul S
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2018 Dec; 43(6):729-736. PubMed ID: 29785609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Nonmem 7.2 estimation methods and parallel processing efficiency on a target-mediated drug disposition model.
Gibiansky L; Gibiansky E; Bauer R
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Feb; 39(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 22101761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation and evaluation of the SAEM algorithm for longitudinal ordered categorical data with an illustration in pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics.
Savic RM; Mentré F; Lavielle M
AAPS J; 2011 Mar; 13(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 21063925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of estimation methods and power of tests of discrete covariates in repeated time-to-event parametric models: application to Gaucher patients treated by imiglucerase.
Vigan M; Stirnemann J; Mentré F
AAPS J; 2014 May; 16(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 24570340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation-maximization (EM) methods in NONMEM: real data experience with complex nonlinear parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model.
Bach T; An G
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2021 Aug; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 33884580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of the SAEM and FOCEI Algorithms in the Open-Source, Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Tool nlmixr.
Schoemaker R; Fidler M; Laveille C; Wilkins JJ; Hooijmaijers R; Post TM; Trame MN; Xiong Y; Wang W
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2019 Dec; 8(12):923-930. PubMed ID: 31654482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance in population models for count data, part II: a new SAEM algorithm.
Savic R; Lavielle M
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Aug; 36(4):367-79. PubMed ID: 19680795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of bias, precision, robustness and runtime for estimation methods in NONMEM 7.
Johansson ÅM; Ueckert S; Plan EL; Hooker AC; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2014 Jun; 41(3):223-38. PubMed ID: 24801864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fisher information matrix for nonlinear mixed effects multiple response models: evaluation of the appropriateness of the first order linearization using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.
Bazzoli C; Retout S; Mentré F
Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1940-56. PubMed ID: 19266541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of the SAEM algorithm in MONOLIX software for estimation of population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic-viral dynamics parameters of maraviroc in asymptomatic HIV subjects.
Chan PL; Jacqmin P; Lavielle M; McFadyen L; Weatherley B
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Feb; 38(1):41-61. PubMed ID: 21088872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance comparison of various maximum likelihood nonlinear mixed-effects estimation methods for dose-response models.
Plan EL; Maloney A; Mentré F; Karlsson MO; Bertrand J
AAPS J; 2012 Sep; 14(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 22528503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of nonlinear mixed effects models in the presence of informative dropout.
Björnsson MA; Friberg LE; Simonsson US
AAPS J; 2015 Jan; 17(1):245-55. PubMed ID: 25421458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two bootstrapping routines for obtaining imprecision estimates for nonparametric parameter distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models.
Baverel PG; Savic RM; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Feb; 38(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 21076858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of the glucose minimal model by stochastic nonlinear-mixed effects methods.
Largajolli A; Bertoldo A; Cobelli C
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5482-5. PubMed ID: 23367170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The back-step method--method for obtaining unbiased population parameter estimates for ordered categorical data.
Kjellsson MC; Jönsson S; Karlsson MO
AAPS J; 2004 Aug; 6(3):e19. PubMed ID: 15760104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the performance of FOCE and different expectation-maximization methods in handling complex population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
Liu X; Wang Y
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Aug; 43(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 27215925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mixed model estimation methods for the Rasch model.
Rijmen F; Tuerlinckx F; Meulders M; Smits DJ; Balázs K
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):273-88. PubMed ID: 15942071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
