BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21229456)

  • 21. Social processing improves recall performance.
    Reysen MB; Adair SA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 18605503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are survival processing memory advantages based on ancestral priorities?
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):564-9. PubMed ID: 21327372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
    Shaw RJ; Craik FI
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating the encoding-retrieval match in recognition memory: effects of experimental design, specificity, and retention interval.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1101-9. PubMed ID: 21156873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A role for self-referential processing in tasks requiring participants to imagine survival on the savannah.
    Klein SB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1234-42. PubMed ID: 22409181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm.
    Butler AC; Kang SH; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 19857018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks.
    Engelkamp J
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jan; 25(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 9046874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
    Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
    Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recall of morphologically complex forms is affected by memory task but not dyslexia.
    Service E; Tujulin AM
    Brain Lang; 2002; 81(1-3):42-54. PubMed ID: 12081380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.
    Bäckman L; Nilsson LG
    Exp Aging Res; 1985; 11(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 4092720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.
    Loaiza VM; McCabe DP; Youngblood JL; Rose NS; Myerson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1258-63. PubMed ID: 21707214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Associative spread as a mediating variable in the generation effect.
    Widner RL
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 8556532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are animacy effects in episodic memory independent of encoding instructions?
    Gelin M; Bugaiska A; Méot A; Bonin P
    Memory; 2017 Jan; 25(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 26642740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall.
    Wammes JD; Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1752-76. PubMed ID: 26444654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dying scenarios improve recall as much as survival scenarios.
    Burns DJ; Hart J; Kramer ME
    Memory; 2014; 22(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 23678953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.
    McCabe DP; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):389-402. PubMed ID: 21264598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hypermnesia for high-imagery words: the effects of interpolated tasks.
    Shaw GA; Bekerian DA
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 2017034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Varying retrieval conditions to study survival processing.
    Alban MW; Annibal SC
    Memory; 2022 Oct; 30(9):1087-1102. PubMed ID: 35620853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories.
    Scullin MK; Einstein GO; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 19460950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.