216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21229567)
1. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of macrosomia in the postdates population: combining sonographic estimates of fetal weight with glucose challenge testing.
Sylvestre G; Divon MY; Onyeije C; Fisher M
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(5):287-90. PubMed ID: 11132584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia cannot be improved by combination with pregnancy-specific characteristics.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Burkhardt T; Wisser J; Kurmanavicius J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 19266500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review.
Coomarasamy A; Connock M; Thornton J; Khan KS
BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1461-6. PubMed ID: 16225563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
Combs CA; Rosenn B; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
Shulman Y; Shah BR; Berger H; Yoon EW; Helpaerin I; Mei-Dan E; Aviram A; Retnakaran R; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101042. PubMed ID: 37286100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation: a matter of presentation.
Melamed N; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Yogev Y; Pardo J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 21229551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of fetal anthropometric measures to predict the risk for shoulder dystocia.
Burkhardt T; Schmidt M; Kurmanavicius J; Zimmermann R; Schäffer L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23836579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the amniotic fluid index combined with estimated fetal weight within 10 days of delivery for prediction of macrosomia at birth.
Ben-Haroush A; Melamed N; Mashiach R; Meizner I; Yogev Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1029-32. PubMed ID: 18577666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the accuracy of multiple sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas: a 10-year experience from a single center.
Barel O; Vaknin Z; Tovbin J; Herman A; Maymon R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 May; 32(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 23620324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia.
Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Hod M
J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 15085885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
McLaren RA; Puckett JL; Chauhan SP
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Ben-Haroush A; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of fetal length in the prediction of fetal weight.
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Linder N; Efrat Z; Bardin R; Wiznitzer A; Meizner I
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 May; 31(5):687-94. PubMed ID: 22535715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
