654 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21229915)
1. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Gröndahl K; Ekestubbe A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 18783419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Thilander-Klang A; Ekestubbe A; Helmrot E; Gröndahl K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Feb; 37(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 18239034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Simulated Vertical Root Fractures: Which Cone-beam Computed Tomographic System Is the Most Accurate?
Elsaltani MH; Farid MM; Eldin Ashmawy MS
J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):972-7. PubMed ID: 27130336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology.
Lofthag-Hansen S; Huumonen S; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 17178504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning.
Okano T; Harata Y; Sugihara Y; Sakaino R; Tsuchida R; Iwai K; Seki K; Araki K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 19176649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel method to estimate the volume of bone defects using cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
Esposito SA; Huybrechts B; Slagmolen P; Cotti E; Coucke W; Pauwels R; Lambrechts P; Jacobs R
J Endod; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1111-5. PubMed ID: 23953281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Endodontics in motion: new concepts, materials and techniques 2. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning].
Özok AR; Metska ME
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2015 Sep; 122(9):465-72. PubMed ID: 26397106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction.
Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars.
Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype.
Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.
Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners.
Loubele M; Jacobs R; Maes F; Denis K; White S; Coudyzer W; Lambrichts I; van Steenberghe D; Suetens P
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):309-18. PubMed ID: 18757715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in nonendodontically treated teeth.
Brady E; Mannocci F; Brown J; Wilson R; Patel S
Int Endod J; 2014 Aug; 47(8):735-46. PubMed ID: 24182358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
