These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21233045)
21. Improved mammographic CAD performance using multi-view information: a Bayesian network framework. Velikova M; Samulski M; Lucas PJ; Karssemeijer N Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(5):1131-47. PubMed ID: 19174596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography and computer-aided detection. The JS; Schilling KJ; Hoffmeister JW; Friedmann E; McGinnis R; Holcomb RG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):337-40. PubMed ID: 19155392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. On the comparison of FROC curves in mammography CAD systems. Bornefalk H; Hermansson AB Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 15789587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection. Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms. Tan M; Qian W; Pu J; Liu H; Zheng B Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(11):4413-27. PubMed ID: 25984710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods. Zheng B; Tan J; Ganott MA; Chough DM; Gur D Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1338-47. PubMed ID: 19632867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications]. Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Discriminating solitary cysts from soft tissue lesions in mammography using a pretrained deep convolutional neural network. Kooi T; van Ginneken B; Karssemeijer N; den Heeten A Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):1017-1027. PubMed ID: 28094850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms. Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views. Gupta S; Markey MK Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination. Lauria A Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II. James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment. Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: interactive decision support versus prompts. Hupse R; Samulski M; Lobbes MB; Mann RM; Mus R; den Heeten GJ; Beijerinck D; Pijnappel RM; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 23091171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Parameter optimization of a computer-aided diagnosis system for detection of masses on digitized mammograms. Radovic M; Milosevic M; Ninkovic S; Filipovic N; Peulic A Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(6):757-74. PubMed ID: 26409521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]