BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21233733)

  • 1. Whole cranial vault expansion by continual occipital and fronto-orbital distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Komuro Y; Shimizu A; Ueda A; Miyajima M; Nakanishi H; Arai H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 22(1):269-72. PubMed ID: 21233733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous fronto-orbital advancement and dynamic posterior cranial vault expansion in Apert syndrome.
    Nadal-López E; Gonzalez-Ramos J; Dogliotti PL; Routabul C; Zuccaro G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):178-80. PubMed ID: 22337402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lateral orbital expansion and gradual fronto-orbital advancement: an option to treat severe syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Nishimoto S; Oyama T; Nagashima T; Osaki Y; Yoshimura Y; Fukuda K; Kawai K; Tsumano T; Kakibuchi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1622-7. PubMed ID: 19098565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis.
    Derderian CA; Wink JD; McGrath JL; Collinsworth A; Bartlett SP; Taylor JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jun; 135(6):1665-1672. PubMed ID: 25724062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior calvarial distraction in craniosynostosis - an evolving technique.
    Wiberg A; Magdum S; Richards PG; Jayamohan J; Wall SA; Johnson D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):799-806. PubMed ID: 22560871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis in syndromal craniosynostosis.
    Meling TR; Hans-Erik H; Per S; Due-Tonnessen BJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 16432404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fronto-facial monobloc distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis. Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment outcome and facial growth.
    Ko EW; Chen PK; Tai IC; Huang CS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 22094394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frontofacial advancement by internal distraction devices. A technical modification for the management of craniofacial dysostosis in early childhood.
    Adolphs N; Klein M; Haberl EJ; Menneking H; Hoffmeister B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 41(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 22483446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open cranial vault remodeling: the evolving role of distraction osteogenesis.
    Derderian CA; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):229-34. PubMed ID: 22337415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appropriate indication of fronto-orbital advancement by distraction osteogenesis in syndromic craniosynostosis: Beyond the conventional technique.
    Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Kubota Y; Akita S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2079-84. PubMed ID: 26463472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cranial vault distraction: its illusionary effect and limitation.
    Yano H; Tanaka K; Sueyoshi O; Takahashi K; Hirata R; Hirano A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jan; 117(1):193-200; discussion 201. PubMed ID: 16404266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utilization of postcranioplasty skull molding caps in the treatment of Apert syndrome.
    McIntosh BC; Lee SS; Ball LL; Persing JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1566-70. PubMed ID: 19098553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New trends in cranio-orbital and midface distraction for craniofacial dysostosis.
    Hopper RA
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Aug; 20(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 22894998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Additional distraction osteogenesis after conventional fronto-orbital advancement.
    Fujimori Y; Ueda K; Oba S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 16(6):1064-9. PubMed ID: 16327555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orbital change following Le Fort III advancement in syndromic craniosynostosis: quantitative evaluation of orbital volume, infra-orbital rim and globe position.
    Nout E; van Bezooijen JS; Koudstaal MJ; Veenland JF; Hop WC; Wolvius EB; van der Wal KG
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 40(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 21752661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fronto-orbital advancement with simultaneous LeFort III-distraction.
    Kubler AC; Speder B; Zoller JE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 32(5):291-5. PubMed ID: 15458670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reossification of cranium and zygomatic arch after monobloc frontofacial distraction advancement for syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Oyama A; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Renier D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1905-9. PubMed ID: 19816373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior vault distraction with midface distraction without osteotomy as a first stage for syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Bailey RL; Heuer GG; Taylor JA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1263-7. PubMed ID: 23851785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suitable indication for the application of distraction osteogenesis: occipital enlargement for lambdoid synostosis.
    Satoh K; Mitsukawa N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 24(5):1530-4. PubMed ID: 24036720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orbital aspects following monobloc advancement in syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Bender CA; Veneman W; Veenland JF; Mathijssen IM; Hop WC; Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e146-53. PubMed ID: 23352809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.