176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21234626)
1. Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects.
Mulier KE; Nguyen AH; Delaney JP; Marquez S
Hernia; 2011 Jun; 15(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 21234626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis.
Kaufmann R; Jairam AP; Mulder IM; Wu Z; Verhelst J; Vennix S; Giesen LJX; Clahsen-van Groningen MC; Jeekel J; Lange JF
Br J Surg; 2017 Dec; 104(13):1884-1893. PubMed ID: 28901533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of abdominal wall hernia repair with biologic mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™.
Cheng AW; Abbas MA; Tejirian T
Am Surg; 2014 Oct; 80(10):999-1002. PubMed ID: 25264647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dermal collagen matrices for ventral hernia repair: comparative analysis in a rat model.
Broderick G; McIntyre J; Noury M; Strom HM; Psoinos C; Christakas A; Billiar K; Hurwitz ZM; Lalikos JF; Ignotz RA; Dunn RM
Hernia; 2012 Jun; 16(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 22120024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic prostheses for abdominal hernia repair.
de Castro Brás LE; Shurey S; Sibbons PD
Hernia; 2012 Feb; 16(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 21805341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital wide porcine mesh conversion results in cost savings with equivalent clinical outcomes.
Byrge N; Mone MC; Vargo D
Am J Surg; 2017 Jun; 213(6):1042-1045. PubMed ID: 28214477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate/absorbable barrier composite mesh in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Scott JR; Deeken CR; Martindale RG; Rosen MJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):3691-701. PubMed ID: 27369286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early biocompatibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Melman L; Jenkins ED; Hamilton NA; Bender LC; Brodt MD; Deeken CR; Greco SC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
Hernia; 2011 Apr; 15(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 21222009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of enzymatic degradation on the mechanical properties of biological scaffold materials.
Annor AH; Tang ME; Pui CL; Ebersole GC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD; Deeken CR
Surg Endosc; 2012 Oct; 26(10):2767-78. PubMed ID: 22538685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not all biologics are equal!
Shah BC; Tiwari MM; Goede MR; Eichler MJ; Hollins RR; McBride CL; Thompson JS; Oleynikov D
Hernia; 2011 Apr; 15(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 21188442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decreased hernia recurrence using autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with Strattice™ mesh in a rodent ventral hernia model.
Van Eps J; Fernandez-Moure J; Cabrera F; Wang X; Karim A; Corradetti B; Chan P; Dunkin B; Tasciotti E; Weiner B; Ellsworth W
Surg Endosc; 2016 Aug; 30(8):3239-49. PubMed ID: 26578432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.
Gruber-Blum S; Brand J; Keibl C; Fortelny RH; Redl H; Mayer F; Petter-Puchner AH
Hernia; 2017 Apr; 21(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 28012032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair.
Chand B; Indeck M; Needleman B; Finnegan M; Van Sickle KR; Ystgaard B; Gossetti F; Pullan RD; Giordano P; McKinley A
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 24508570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term histologic and mechanical results of a Permacol™ abdominal wall explant.
O'Brien JA; Ignotz R; Montilla R; Broderick GB; Christakis A; Dunn RM
Hernia; 2011 Apr; 15(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 20091328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Remodeling characteristics and biomechanical properties of a crosslinked versus a non-crosslinked porcine dermis scaffolds in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Cavallo JA; Greco SC; Liu J; Frisella MM; Deeken CR; Matthews BD
Hernia; 2015 Apr; 19(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 23483265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Burns NK; Jaffari MV; Rios CN; Mathur AB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jan; 125(1):167-176. PubMed ID: 19910855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study.
Giordano P; Pullan RD; Ystgaard B; Gossetti F; Bradburn M; McKinley AJ; Smart NJ; Daniels IR
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Jul; 19(7):411-7. PubMed ID: 26081430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human versus non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix used for ventral hernia repair: comparison of in vivo fibrovascular remodeling and mechanical repair strength.
Campbell KT; Burns NK; Rios CN; Mathur AB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2321-2332. PubMed ID: 21617466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The in vivo evaluation of tissue-based biomaterials in a rat full-thickness abdominal wall defect model.
Bryan N; Ahswin H; Smart N; Bayon Y; Wohlert S; Hunt JA
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2014 May; 102(4):709-20. PubMed ID: 24155173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair.
Gaertner WB; Bonsack ME; Delaney JP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2007 Oct; 11(10):1275-85. PubMed ID: 17674112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
