203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21234709)
1. Cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine + cisplatin vs. gemcitabine monotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.
Roth JA; Carlson JJ
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2012 Jun; 43(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 21234709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine Alone for Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer in Japan.
Tsukiyama I; Ejiri M; Yamamoto Y; Nakao H; Yoneda M; Matsuura K; Arakawa I; Saito H; Inoue T
J Gastrointest Cancer; 2017 Dec; 48(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 27785685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil for induction chemotherapy of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Wu Q; Liao W; Huang J; Zhang P; Zhang N; Li Q
Oral Oncol; 2020 Apr; 103():104588. PubMed ID: 32070923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract carcinomas.
Abdel-Rahman O; Elsayed Z; Elhalawani H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 4(4):CD011746. PubMed ID: 29624208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost effectiveness of concurrent gemcitabine and cisplatin with radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with stages IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix.
Phippen NT; Leath CA; Chino JP; Jewell EL; Havrilesky LJ; Barnett JC
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Nov; 127(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 22892361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic Evaluation of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of First-Line Advanced Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China: Using Markov Model and Partitioned Survival Model.
Rui M; Shi F; Shang Y; Meng R; Li H
Adv Ther; 2020 Sep; 37(9):3761-3774. PubMed ID: 32647912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for resected pancreatic cancer in the United States based on PRODIGE-24 and APACT trials.
Kharat AA; Nelson R; Au T; Biskupiak J
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Oct; 27(10):1367-1375. PubMed ID: 34595948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin in the first-line setting for Chinese patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Jin C; Zheng H; Zhan M; Wen F; Xu T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Feb; 277(2):577-584. PubMed ID: 31720816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model-based cost-utility analysis of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and S-1 as triple therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer.
Kashiwa M; Matsushita R
Int J Clin Pharm; 2023 Aug; 45(4):875-883. PubMed ID: 37079225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.
Patterson K; Prabhu V; Xu R; Li H; Meng Y; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Batteson R; Pellissier J; Keefe S; Grivas P; de Wit R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 31412011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride, paclitaxel, trabectedin and gemcitabine for advanced recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Edwards SJ; Barton S; Thurgar E; Trevor N
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(7):1-480. PubMed ID: 25626481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-utility analysis of maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib vs observation with predefined second-line treatment after cisplatin-gemcitabine induction chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC: IFCT-GFPC 0502-Eco phase III study.
Borget I; Pérol M; Pérol D; Lavolé A; Greillier L; Dô P; Westeel V; Crequit J; Léna H; Monnet I; Le Caer H; Fournel P; Falchero L; Poudenx M; Vaylet F; Chabaud S; Vergnenegre A; Zalcman G; Chouaïd C;
BMC Cancer; 2014 Dec; 14():953. PubMed ID: 25511923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topotecan for the treatment of recurrent and stage IVB carcinoma of the cervix.
Paton F; Paulden M; Saramago P; Manca A; Misso K; Palmer S; Eastwood A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14 Suppl 1():55-62. PubMed ID: 20507804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is the progression free survival advantage of concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced cervical cancer worth the additional cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Smith B; Cohn DE; Clements A; Tierney BJ; Straughn JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Sep; 130(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 23718933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-minimization analysis for Portugal of five doublet chemotherapy regimens from two phase III trials in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Pimentel FL; Bhalla S; Laranjeira L; Guerreiro M
Lung Cancer; 2006 Jun; 52(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 16650499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Translating the ABC-02 trial into daily practice: outcome of palliative treatment in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin.
Dierks J; Gaspersz MP; Belkouz A; van Vugt JLA; Coelen RJS; de Groot JWB; Ten Tije AJ; Meijer WG; Pruijt JFM; van Voorthuizen T; van Spronsen DJ; Rentinck M; Ten Oever D; Smit JM; Otten HM; van Gulik TM; Wilmink JW; Groot Koerkamp B; Klümpen H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):807-812. PubMed ID: 29265948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Takeda AL; Jones J; Loveman E; Tan SC; Clegg AJ
Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(19):iii, ix-xi, 1-62. PubMed ID: 17462169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A retrospective study of chemotherapy with cisplatin plus gemcitabine after the failure of gemcitabine monotherapy for biliary tract cancer.
Kameda R; Ando T; Kobayashi S; Ueno M; Ohkawa S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):636-40. PubMed ID: 23619988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Clegg A; Scott DA; Sidhu M; Hewitson P; Waugh N
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(32):1-195. PubMed ID: 12065068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Information of Erlotinib, Afatinib, and Cisplatin-Pemetrexed for First-Line Treatment of Advanced EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the United States.
Ting J; Tien Ho P; Xiang P; Sugay A; Abdel-Sattar M; Wilson L
Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):774-82. PubMed ID: 26409604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
