184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21235300)
1. Lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: is a unilateral microsurgical approach sufficient for decompression?
Morgalla MH; Noak N; Merkle M; Tatagiba MS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 21235300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.
Papavero L; Thiel M; Fritzsche E; Kunze C; Westphal M; Kothe R
Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. PubMed ID: 19934993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.
Hong SW; Choi KY; Ahn Y; Baek OK; Wang JC; Lee SH; Lee HY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(3):E172-8. PubMed ID: 21192307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.
Oertel MF; Ryang YM; Korinth MC; Gilsbach JM; Rohde V
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1264-9; discussion 1269-70. PubMed ID: 17277689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Komp M; Hahn P; Oezdemir S; Giannakopoulos A; Heikenfeld R; Kasch R; Merk H; Godolias G; Ruetten S
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 25675060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
Thomé C; Zevgaridis D; Leheta O; Bäzner H; Pöckler-Schöniger C; Wöhrle J; Schmiedek P
J Neurosurg Spine; 2005 Aug; 3(2):129-41. PubMed ID: 16370302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M
Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.
Rosen DS; O'Toole JE; Eichholz KM; Hrubes M; Huo D; Sandhu FA; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2007 Mar; 60(3):503-9; discussion 509-10. PubMed ID: 17327795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Minamide A; Yoshida M; Yamada H; Nakagawa Y; Kawai M; Maio K; Hashizume H; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Dec; 19(6):664-71. PubMed ID: 24093466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach and Classic Laminectomy in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A retrospective Clinical Study.
Yaman O; Ozdemir N; Dagli AT; Acar E; Dalbayrak S; Temiz C
Turk Neurosurg; 2015; 25(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 26014006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spinal canal morphology and clinical outcomes of microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Choi WS; Oh CH; Ji GY; Shin SC; Lee JB; Park DH; Cho TH
Eur Spine J; 2014 May; 23(5):991-8. PubMed ID: 24292345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
