These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21235495)

  • 1. Sensory-dependent knowledge in young and elderly adults: arguments from the cross-modal priming effect.
    Vallet G; Simard M; Versace R
    Curr Aging Sci; 2011 Jul; 4(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 21235495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perceptual nature of the cross-modal priming effect: arguments in favor of a sensory-based conception of memory.
    Vallet G; Brunel L; Versace R
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 20178946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The perceptual nature of audiovisual interactions for semantic knowledge in young and elderly adults.
    Vallet GT; Simard M; Versace R; Mazza S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Jul; 143(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23684850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The disconnection syndrome in the Alzheimer's disease: the cross-modal priming example.
    Vallet GT; Hudon C; Simard M; Versace R
    Cortex; 2013 Oct; 49(9):2402-15. PubMed ID: 23294572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].
    Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R
    Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual-auditory events: cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory.
    Greene AJ; Easton RD; LaShell LS
    Conscious Cogn; 2001 Sep; 10(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 11697874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "The mask who wasn't there": visual masking effect with the perceptual absence of the mask.
    Rey AE; Riou B; Muller D; Dabic S; Versace R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):567-73. PubMed ID: 25133514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Now you see it, now you don't: evidence for age-dependent and age-independent cross-modal distraction.
    Guerreiro MJ; Van Gerven PW
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21443358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A biphasic effect of cross-modal priming on visual shape recognition.
    Kwok SC; Fantoni C; Tamburini L; Wang L; Gerbino W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():43-50. PubMed ID: 29324235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repetition priming for multisensory stimuli: task-irrelevant and task-relevant stimuli are associated if semantically related but with no advantage over uni-sensory stimuli.
    Hecht D; Reiner M; Karni A
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():236-44. PubMed ID: 19022232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of auditory spatial attention on cross-modal semantic priming effect: evidence from N400 effect.
    Wang H; Zhang G; Liu B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):331-339. PubMed ID: 27722788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal evaluative priming: emotional sounds influence the processing of emotion words.
    Scherer LD; Larsen RJ
    Emotion; 2011 Feb; 11(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 21401242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The degraded concept representation system in semantic dementia: damage to pan-modal hub, then visual spoke.
    Hoffman P; Jones RW; Ralph MA
    Brain; 2012 Dec; 135(Pt 12):3770-80. PubMed ID: 23250888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice makes perfect: High performance gains in older adults engaged in selective attention within and across sensory modalities.
    Rienäcker F; Jacobs HIL; Van Heugten CM; Van Gerven PWM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():101-111. PubMed ID: 30240890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech-in-speech perception and executive function involvement.
    Perrone-Bertolotti M; Tassin M; Meunier F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180084. PubMed ID: 28708830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PRP-paradigm provides evidence for a perceptual origin of the negative compatibility effect.
    Krüger D; Klapötke S; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):866-81. PubMed ID: 20947385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of modality and repetition in a continuous recognition memory task: Repetition has no effect on auditory recognition memory.
    Amir Kassim A; Rehman R; Price JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():72-80. PubMed ID: 29407247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive Function Prediction of Performance During Dual-Tasks Across Adults With and Without Hearing Loss.
    Harvey J; Seeman S; von Hapsburg D
    Curr Aging Sci; 2018; 11(3):155-164. PubMed ID: 30543178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.