These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21236171)
1. Stomatal control of transpiration. Meinzer FC Trends Ecol Evol; 1993 Aug; 8(8):289-94. PubMed ID: 21236171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patchy stomatal behavior during midday depression of leaf CO₂ exchange in tropical trees. Kamakura M; Kosugi Y; Takanashi S; Matsumoto K; Okumura M; Philip E Tree Physiol; 2011 Feb; 31(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 21383025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid. Rogiers SY; Greer DH; Hatfield JM; Hutton RJ; Clarke SJ; Hutchinson PA; Somers A Tree Physiol; 2012 Mar; 32(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 22199014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding high relative air humidity during critical stages of leaf ontogeny is decisive for stomatal functioning. Fanourakis D; Carvalho SM; Almeida DP; Heuvelink E Physiol Plant; 2011 Jul; 142(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 21457269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regulation of stomatal conductance and transpiration in forest canopies. Whitehead D Tree Physiol; 1998; 18(8_9):633-644. PubMed ID: 12651352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stomatal action directly feeds back on leaf turgor: new insights into the regulation of the plant water status from non-invasive pressure probe measurements. Ache P; Bauer H; Kollist H; Al-Rasheid KA; Lautner S; Hartung W; Hedrich R Plant J; 2010 Jun; 62(6):1072-82. PubMed ID: 20345603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stomatal regulation by microclimate and tree water relations: interpreting ecophysiological field data with a hydraulic plant model. Zweifel R; Steppe K; Sterck FJ J Exp Bot; 2007; 58(8):2113-31. PubMed ID: 17490998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of abscisic acid in disturbed stomatal response characteristics of Tradescantia virginiana during growth at high relative air humidity. Nejad AR; van Meeteren U J Exp Bot; 2007; 58(3):627-36. PubMed ID: 17175553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Water availability and genetic effects on water relations of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands. Gonzalez-Benecke CA; Martin TA Tree Physiol; 2010 Mar; 30(3):376-92. PubMed ID: 20071360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term responses of leaf growth rate to water deficit scale up to whole-plant and crop levels: an integrated modelling approach in maize. Chenu K; Chapman SC; Hammer GL; McLean G; Salah HB; Tardieu F Plant Cell Environ; 2008 Mar; 31(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18088328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Edge type affects leaf-level water relations and estimated transpiration of Eucalyptus arenacea. Wright TE; Tausz M; Kasel S; Volkova L; Merchant A; Bennett LT Tree Physiol; 2012 Mar; 32(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 22367763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Leaf hydraulic conductivity and stomatal responses to humidity in amphistomatous leaves. Mott KA Plant Cell Environ; 2007 Nov; 30(11):1444-9. PubMed ID: 17897414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling of stomatal density response to atmospheric CO2. Konrad W; Roth-Nebelsick A; Grein M J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(4):638-58. PubMed ID: 18538792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ecophysiological relevance of cuticular transpiration of deciduous and evergreen plants in relation to stomatal closure and leaf water potential. Burghardt M; Riederer M J Exp Bot; 2003 Aug; 54(389):1941-9. PubMed ID: 12815029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decoupling the influence of leaf and root hydraulic conductances on stomatal conductance and its sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit as soil dries in a drained loblolly pine plantation. Domec JC; Noormets A; King JS; Sun G; McNulty SG; Gavazzi MJ; Boggs JL; Treasure EA Plant Cell Environ; 2009 Aug; 32(8):980-91. PubMed ID: 19344336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient explained by a stomatal control mechanism incorporating variable plant hydraulic conductance. Franks PJ; Drake PL; Froend RH Plant Cell Environ; 2007 Jan; 30(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 17177873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydraulic properties of naturally regenerated beech saplings respond to canopy opening. Caquet B; Barigah TS; Cochard H; Montpied P; Collet C; Dreyer E; Epron D Tree Physiol; 2009 Nov; 29(11):1395-405. PubMed ID: 19744973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors affecting stomatal uptake of ozone by different canopies and a comparison between dose and exposure. Zhang L; Vet R; Brook JR; Legge AH Sci Total Environ; 2006 Oct; 370(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 16846632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stomatal responses to humidity in isolated epidermes. Shope JC; Peak D; Mott KA Plant Cell Environ; 2008 Sep; 31(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 18541007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Control of leaf growth by abscisic acid: hydraulic or non-hydraulic processes? Tardieu F; Parent B; Simonneau T Plant Cell Environ; 2010 Apr; 33(4):636-47. PubMed ID: 20002334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]