BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21236555)

  • 1. Single port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions: a single center experience in Korea.
    Jung YW; Choi YM; Chung CK; Yim GW; Lee M; Lee SH; Paek JH; Nam EJ; Kim YT; Kim SW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Apr; 155(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 21236555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease.
    Escobar PF; Bedaiwy MA; Fader AN; Falcone T
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):2074.e7-10. PubMed ID: 20100614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
    Kim TJ; Lee YY; Kim MJ; Kim CJ; Kang H; Choi CH; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 19835804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopy for adnexal disease: a case--control study.
    Fagotti A; Rossitto C; Marocco F; Gallotta V; Bottoni C; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    Surg Innov; 2011 Mar; 18(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 21245066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes.
    Lee YY; Kim TJ; Kim CJ; Park HS; Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee JH; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Aug; 151(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 20392556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for adnexal tumors: one surgeon's initial experience over a one-year period.
    Kim WC; Lee JE; Kwon YS; Koo YJ; Lee IH; Lim KT
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Oct; 158(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 21620559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with wound retractor for adnexal tumors: a single center experience with the initial 100 cases.
    Takeda A; Imoto S; Mori M; Nakano T; Nakamura H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 21470765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease: a comparative study.
    Bedaiwy MA; Starks D; Hurd W; Escobar PF
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012; 73(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 22456304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety and feasibility of a single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery during pregnancy.
    Lee JH; Lee JR; Jee BC; Suh CS; Kim SH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):864-70. PubMed ID: 23850362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: a randomized trial.
    Chou LY; Sheu BC; Chang DY; Huang SC; Chen SY; Hsu WC; Chang WC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Dec; 153(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 20705381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single Port Transumbilical Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Adnexal Masses: A Retrospective Study of Feasibility and Safety.
    Wang SY; Yin L; Guan XM; Xiao BB; Zhang Y; Delgado A
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Jun; 129(11):1305-10. PubMed ID: 27231167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) - is it feasible in gynecological surgery?
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Hornemann A; Luedders D; Diedrich K; Bohlmann MK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 Feb; 90(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 21241267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients.
    Lee YS; Kim JH; Moon EJ; Kim JJ; Lee KH; Oh SJ; Park SM; Hong TH
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2009 Dec; 19(6):493-6. PubMed ID: 20027094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes.
    Yim GW; Lee M; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim YT; Kim SW
    Surg Innov; 2013 Feb; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 22410390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A minimally invasive approach to laparoscopic surgery for large adnexal cysts with a multichannel port using a wound retractor.
    Yi SW
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2012 Aug; 22(4):e176-81. PubMed ID: 22874694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experience with laparoscopic surgery for adnexal masses at the Regional Hospital of Temuco, Chile].
    Celis R; Sierralta P; Valdés P; Leiva A; Soto E
    Rev Med Chil; 1999 Jun; 127(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 10513079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery with a multichannel port using a wound retractor: is it safe and minimally scarring?
    Yi SW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Dec; 19(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 19694570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report.
    Desai MM; Rao PP; Aron M; Pascal-Haber G; Desai MR; Mishra S; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 18086101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.
    Yoon BS; Park H; Seong SJ; Park CT; Jun HS; Kim IH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):190-3. PubMed ID: 21741748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transumbilical laparoscopic urological surgery: are special devices strictly necessary?
    Branco AW; Kondo W; Stunitz LC; Filho AJ; de George MA
    BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1136-42. PubMed ID: 19338528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.